ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 8.11 Data masking

In this guide, I will show you exactly how to implement ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 and ensure you pass your audit. You will get a complete walkthrough of the control, practical implementation examples, and access to the ISO 27001 templates and toolkit that make compliance easy.

I am Stuart Barker, an ISO 27001 Lead Auditor with over 30 years of experience conducting hundreds of audits. I will cut through the jargon to show you exactly what changed in the 2022 update and provide you with plain-English advice to get you certified.

Key Takeaways: ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 Data Masking

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 is a new control introduced in the 2022 update. it requires organizations to use data masking to limit the exposure of sensitive information (including PII). The goal is to ensure that users only see the specific data required to perform their task, for example, a customer service agent seeing only the last four digits of a credit card rather than the full number.

Core requirements for compliance include:

• Topic-Specific Policy: You must integrate data masking requirements into your Access Control or Data Protection policies. This should define what data gets masked and who is allowed to see the unmasked version.
• Risk-Based Application: Masking should be applied based on the classification of the data. High-risk data (like health records or passwords) requires stronger masking or anonymization techniques.
• Development & Test Security: One of the biggest audit traps is using “real” data in test environments. This control mandates that sensitive data in non-production environments must be masked or replaced with synthetic data.
• Legal Compliance: Data masking is a primary method for meeting “Privacy by Design” requirements under regulations like GDPR.

Audit Focus: Auditors will look for “The Visibility Gap”:

1. The Screens: “Show me the view a standard user has of the customer database. Are sensitive fields like Social Security numbers hidden?”
2. Dev/Test Environments: “How do you ensure developers aren’t looking at real customer names while debugging code?”
3. The Reversibility: “If you use pseudonymization, how is the ‘key’ to unlock the real data protected?”

Data Hiding Techniques Comparison:

Technique	Description	Reversible?	Example
Masking	Replacing characters with symbols.	No (usually)	****-****-****-1234
Pseudonymization	Replacing data with an alias or token.	Yes (with a key)	User_882 instead of “Jane Doe”
Anonymization	Irreversibly breaking the link to a person.	No	“Female, Age 25-30, London”
Redaction	Completely removing/blacking out text.	No	[REDACTED]

What is ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11?

Data masking is used to reduce the exposure of sensitive information, including personally identifiable data, by masking it and presenting only the data that is required to perform the task at hand.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 Data Masking is an ISO 27001 control that requires an organisation to mask data based on business requirements, laws and regulations to protect sensitive data.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 Purpose

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 is preventive control that ensure you limit the exposure of sensitive data including PII, and you comply with legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 Definition

The ISO 27001 standard defines ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 as:

Data masking should be used in accordance with the organisation’s topic-specific policy on access control and other related topic-specific policies, and business requirements, taking applicable legislation into consideration.

ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 8.11 Data Masking

Why is data masking important?

Data masking is important because we want to limit the exposure of confidential and sensitive data. Showing information to people that they do not need to perform the task introduces risk. It is not unheard of for people to take photographs of screens and screen shots to get access to confidential and sensitive information. This is especially true where the data has a significant financial value.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 Free Training Video

In the video ISO 27001 Data Masking Explained – ISO27001:2022 Annex A 8.11 I show you how to implement it and how to pass the audit.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 Explainer Video

In this beginner’s guide to ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 Data Masking, ISO 27001 Lead Auditor Stuart Barker and his team talk you through what it is, how to implement in and how to pass the audit. Free ISO 27001 training.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 Podcast

In this episode: Lead Auditor Stuart Barker and team do a deep dive into the ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 8.11 Data Masking. The podcast explores what it is, why it is important and the path to compliance.

How to implement ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11

You are going to have to ensure that you:

• Implement a topic specific policy for access control
• define the requirements for data masking based on information classification level
• implement controls based on the data masking requirements
• keep records
• Test the controls that you have to make sure they are working

There are several approaches to hiding data that include data masking, pseudonymisation and anonymisation.
Let us take a look at the techniques for data masking that you can implement.

Anonymisation

This technique fundamentally and irreversibly alters data in a way that it can no longer be directly or indirectly identified.

Pseudonymisation

This technique uses an alias in place of data. It replaces data with an alias. If you know the algorithm used to create the alias it is possible to recreate the data. When this technique is used, every effort is taken to protect the algorithm.

Data Masking Techniques

This technique seeks to conceal, hide or substitute data. Let us consider

• Encryption
• Substitution
• Hashing
• Varying numbers and dates
• Deleting characters

What are the 3 layers of threat intelligence?

The 3 layers of threat intelligence are:

1. Strategic Threat Intelligence

High level information about the threat landscape.

2. Tactical Threat Intelligence

Intelligence on tools, techniques and attack methodologies.

3. Operational Threat Intelligence

Intelligence on specific attacks and indicators.

Masking Techniques Comparison Table

Technique	Description	Reversible?	Example
Masking	Hiding characters with symbols.	No (usually)	P@ssw*rd
Pseudonymisation	Replacing data with an alias/token.	Yes (if you have the key)	User_12345 instead of “John Smith”
Anonymisation	Irreversibly destroying the link to the person.	No	Unknown Male, Age 30-40
Redaction	Blacking out text completely.	No	[REDACTED]

How to comply

To comply with ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 8.11 you are going to implement the ‘how’ to the ‘what’ the control is expecting.
In short measure you are going to:

• Understand and record the legal, regulatory and contractual requirements you have for data
• Conduct a risk assessment
• Based on the legal, regulatory, contractual requirements and the risk assessment you will implement an
  information classification scheme
• Implement and communicate your topic specific policy on access control
• Document and implement your processes and technical implementations for data masking
• Check that the controls are working by conducting internal audits

How to pass an ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 audit

To pass an audit of ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 8.11 Data Masking you are going to make sure that you have followed the steps above in how to comply.
You are going to do that by first conducting an internal audit, following the How to Conduct an ISO 27001 Internal Audit Guide.

What will an auditor check?

The audit is going to check a number of areas. Lets go through the main ones

1. That you have documentation

What this means is that you need to show that you have documented your legal, regulatory and contractual requirements
for data masking. Where data protection laws exist that you have documented what those laws are and what those
requirements are. That you have an information classification scheme and a topic specific policy for access control and
that you have documented your data masking techniques.

2. That you have masked data appropriately

They will look at systems to seek evidence of data masking. This could be as simple as looking at login screens to see what masking you are doing on the password entry. It could also look at your production systems for evidence that sensitive data is masked.

3. That you have conducted internal audits

The audit will want to see that you have tested the controls and evidenced that they are operating. This is usually in the form of the required internal audits. They will check the records and outputs of those internal audits.

Top 3 ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 mistakes and how to avoid them

In my experience, the top 3 mistakes people make for ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 8.11 Data Masking are

1. You use unmasked data where you should not

Examples of this would include having sensitive data in development and test environments. Those areas that you might not think about. Consider for example using sensitive data as filenames, or in email subject fields or in email body text. Checking in CRM systems and off the shelf systems to see that data masking is enabled and configured is a good step here.

2. You don’t know your legal obligations

This is a massive mistake that we see, where people assume ISO 27001 is just information security and forget that it also checks that appropriate laws are being followed, and in particular data protection laws. Cost saving by not having a data protection expert or ignoring data protection law entirely is a common mistake we see people make when cutting corners and saving costs.

3. Your document and version control is wrong

Keeping your document version control up to date, making sure that version numbers match where used, having a review evidenced in the last 12 months, having documents that have no comments in are all good practices.

Fast Track Compliance with the ISO 27001 Toolkit

---

---

For ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 (Data masking), the requirement is to use data masking in accordance with the organization’s topic-specific policy on access control and other related policies to protect sensitive data. While many SaaS compliance platforms attempt to sell you complex, automated “masking modules,” they often overcomplicate what is fundamentally a governance and procedural requirement.

The High Table ISO 27001 Toolkit is the logical, time-saving solution because it provides the governance structure and policy framework needed to satisfy auditors, allowing you to implement masking effectively using your existing tools without a recurring subscription.

1. Ownership: You Own Your Data Masking Policy Forever

SaaS platforms act as a middleman for your compliance evidence. If you define your masking rules and store your evidence inside their proprietary system, you are essentially renting your own security standards.

• The Toolkit Advantage: You receive the Data Masking Policy and Information Classification Handling Policy in fully editable Word and Excel formats. These are yours forever. You own the documentation that defines how PII and sensitive data are obfuscated, ensuring you are audit-ready without being held to a “subscription ransom.”

2. Simplicity: Use the Tools You Already Know

Annex A 8.11 is about the management of data masking. You don’t need a complex new software interface to manage what your database (like SQL Server or PostgreSQL) or cloud provider already does natively.

• The Toolkit Advantage: Your technical team likely already understands how to implement masking at the database or application level. What they need is the governance layer to prove to an auditor that these actions are consistent and policy-driven. The Toolkit provides pre-written templates that formalize your existing technical work into an auditor-ready framework, without forcing your team to learn a new software platform.

3. Cost: One-Off Fee vs. The “Per-User” Tax

Many compliance SaaS platforms charge more as you add more users, databases, or “integrations.” For a control that applies to your entire development and data lifecycle, these monthly costs can scale aggressively.

• The Toolkit Advantage: You pay a single, one-off fee for the entire toolkit. Whether you are masking one database or a global data lake, the cost of the Governance Documentation remains the same. You save your budget for actual security technology rather than an expensive compliance dashboard.

4. Freedom: No Vendor Lock-In for Your Data Stack

SaaS compliance tools often only integrate with specific, “name-brand” cloud providers. If you use a hybrid setup, niche software, or change your database vendor, the SaaS tool can become a barrier to technical flexibility.

• The Toolkit Advantage: The High Table Toolkit is 100% technology-agnostic. You can edit the Data Masking Procedures to match any technical environment, on-premise, cloud, or third-party apps. You maintain total freedom to evolve your data infrastructure without being constrained by the technical limitations of a rented SaaS platform.

Summary: For Annex A 8.11, an auditor wants to see that you have identified sensitive data and implemented a policy to mask it where appropriate. The High Table ISO 27001 Toolkit provides the governance framework to satisfy this requirement immediately. It is the most direct, cost-effective way to achieve compliance using permanent documentation that you own and control.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.11 FAQ

Related ISO 27001 Controls

ISO 27001 Annex A 5.7 Threat Intelligence

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.27 Secure Systems Architecture and Engineering Principles

Further Reading

How To Create an ISO 27001 Threat Intelligence Process and Report

ISO 27001 Data Protection Policy Template

ISO 27001 Threat Intelligence Process Template

About the author

Stuart Barker is a veteran practitioner with over 30 years of experience in systems security and risk management.

Holding an MSc in Software and Systems Security, Stuart combines academic rigor with extensive operational experience. His background includes over a decade leading Data Governance for General Electric (GE) across Europe, as well as founding and exiting a successful cyber security consultancy.

As a qualified ISO 27001 Lead Auditor and Lead Implementer, Stuart possesses distinct insight into the specific evidence standards required by certification bodies. He has successfully guided hundreds of organizations – from high-growth technology startups to enterprise financial institutions – through the audit lifecycle.

His toolkits represents the distillation of that field experience into a standardised framework. They move beyond theoretical compliance, providing a pragmatic, auditor-verified methodology designed to satisfy ISO/IEC 27001:2022 while minimising operational friction.