ISO 27001 Context of Organisation: Context Generator  | Template | Guide

ISO 27001 Context of the Organisation

In this guide, you will learn what ISO 27001 Context of the Organisation is, how to write it yourself and I give you a template you can download and use right away.

Interactive ISO 27001 Context Generator

A basic AI-Ready Interactive ISO 27001 Context Generator based on business sector to kick start your ISO 27001:2022 Context of Organisation Template.

What ISO 27001 Context of the Organisation

It’s about figuring out who you are, what you do, and what outside forces might affect your information security. Think of it as your company’s information security identity.

The Context of the Organisation is a crucial part of the ISO 27001 standard. It’s all about figuring out the internal and external issues that can impact your ability to keep information secure. Basically, it’s a deep dive into your business environment to see what could help or hurt your info security efforts.

ISO 27001 Context of the Organisation Implementation Summary

Phase	Requirements & Actions	Key Stakeholders
When to Action	At the very beginning of the ISO 27001 journey; requires regular reviews and updates during business changes.	Security Manager, Leadership Team, and relevant employees.
Where to Document	A living document within the formal ISO 27001 documentation toolkit.	Information Security Management System (ISMS) Owners.
How to Write	Define company goals and challenges. External: Analyse laws and regulations, competitors, and economy. Internal: Evaluate culture, risk tolerance, and technology. Stakeholders: Identify interested parties and expectations. Scope: Clearly state parts of the business included in the ISMS.	Legal, HR, IT, and Department Heads.
How to Implement	Integrate gathered insights to draft the Information Security Policy, conduct risk assessments, and select security controls.	Risk Owners and Technical Leads.

How to implement the ISO 27001 Context of Organisation

How to write the ISO 27001 Context of Organisation Video Tutorial

ISO 27001 Context of Organisation Template

The comprehensive ISO 27001:2022 Context of Organisation Template is designed to fast track your implementation and give you an exclusive, industry best practice policy template that is pre written and ready to go.  It is included in the ISO 27001 toolkit.

Applicability to Small Businesses, Tech Startups, and AI Companies

This context of organisation is useful for businesses of all sizes, including small businesses, tech startups, and AI companies.

ISO 27001 Context of the Organisation: Applicability by Business Sector

Organisation Type	Strategic Focus & Benefits	Internal & External Factors	Key Interested Parties
Small Businesses	Resource optimisation; focuses limited budgets on critical security risks using simple, clear documentation.	Internal: Lack of dedicated IT security team. External: Data privacy regulations like GDPR.	Customers (expecting data safety).
Tech Startups	Agility and scalability; provides a security foundation for rapid growth and protecting intellectual property.	Internal: IP protection and product designs. External: High-pressure competitive landscape.	Investors (requiring solid security plans).
AI Companies	Building trust; addresses unique risks regarding data integrity and the ethical use of information.	Internal: Data bias and model integrity. External: AI ethics regulations and public perception.	Regulators and the general public.

How the ISO 27001 toolkit can help

An ISO 27001 toolkit can be a lifesaver. It provides pre-written templates, guides, and checklists for the Context of the Organisation and other parts of the standard. It saves you time and ensures you don’t miss any critical steps.

Comparison: ISO 27001 Toolkit vs Online SaaS Platforms

Feature	ISO 27001 Toolkit (High Table)	Online SaaS Platform
Data Ownership	Permanent Ownership. You download the files and keep them forever. Your security data stays on your infrastructure.	Rented Access. Your data lives on someone else’s server. If you stop paying, you lose access to your “Context” history.
Simplicity & UX	Zero Learning Curve. Built using Word and Excel. Everyone in your leadership team already knows how to use these tools.	High Friction. Requires staff training to navigate proprietary menus, permissions, and complex dashboard layouts.
Total Cost	One-off Investment. Pay once for the complete toolkit with no hidden charges or recurring fees.	Subscription Trap. Expensive monthly or annual seats that increase as your company grows.
Vendor Lock-in	Total Freedom. No proprietary formats. You can move, edit, or archive your files without needing a specific vendor’s permission.	High Lock-in. Exporting data out of a SaaS into a usable format for auditors is often difficult and time-consuming.
Collaboration	Native Integration. Works seamlessly with SharePoint, Google Drive, or Teams—the tools you already use daily.	Isolated Silo. Forces teams to log into yet another platform, often leading to lower engagement and outdated data.

ISO 27001 Clause 4.1: Climate Change Impact Analysis Checklist

ISO 27001 Climate Change Amendment (Clause 4.1)

In 2024, ISO released Amendment 1: Climate Action Changes for ISO 27001:2022. This update explicitly requires organisations to determine if climate change is a relevant internal or external issue. While it does not mandate new security controls, you must provide auditable evidence that you have considered climate-related risks within your strategic context.

ISO 27001 Clause 4.1: Climate Change Impact Analysis

Impact Type	Information Security Risk	Auditor Evidence Requirement
Physical Risks	Increased frequency of extreme weather events causing data centre outages or hardware damage.	Update to Business Continuity Plans (BCP) and site-specific risk assessments.
Supply Chain	Disruption to critical cloud providers or hardware manufacturers due to climate-driven resource scarcity.	Documented review of supplier resilience and geographical hosting diversification.
Regulatory	New green IT legislation and mandatory carbon reporting affecting security operations and hardware disposal.	Evidence of legal and regulatory scan updates within the Context of Organisation document.
Workforce	Potential displacement of staff or remote working challenges due to localized environmental shifts.	Review of remote access security and staff availability within the internal context.

ISO 27001 Clause 4 Evidence Checklist

Mandatory Stage 1 Evidence: Clause 4 Compliance

Evidence Type	Mandatory Clause	Auditor Expectation & “Gotchas”
Context of the Organisation Document	Clause 4.1	Expectation: A formalised analysis (SWOT or PESTLE) of internal culture and external threats. Gotcha: Documents that haven’t been updated to include the 2024 Climate Action amendment.
Interested Parties Register	Clause 4.2	Expectation: A list identifying stakeholders (Investors, Regulators, Customers) and their specific security requirements. Gotcha: Missing the “Expectations” column—simply listing names is insufficient.
ISMS Scope Statement	Clause 4.3	Expectation: A precise definition of the physical, organisational, and technical boundaries. Gotcha: Failing to justify exclusions or omitting third-party dependencies (SaaS/Hosting).
Management Review Minutes	Clause 9.3 / 4.4	Expectation: Evidence that Top Management has reviewed and approved the Context and Scope. Gotcha: Generic minutes that don’t explicitly mention “Changes in internal and external issues.”
Legal and Regulatory Register	Clause 4.2	Expectation: A live document tracking your obligations under GDPR, NIS2, DORA, or local employment laws. Gotcha: Outdated registers that don’t account for recent legislative changes in 2025/2026.

Connecting Context to your Statement of Applicability (SoA)

The Statement of Applicability (SoA) is arguably the most important document in your ISMS. It bridges the gap between your strategic decisions (Clause 4) and your operational controls. As a Lead Auditor, this is the first document I request; if the SoA is weak, it usually signals a fundamental failure in understanding the organisation’s context.

The following guide explains how your Context and Scope directly define your SoA.

Information Security Standards That Need It

This context of organisation is a key part of ISO 27001, which is an international standard for managing information security. Other standards that need it include:

Information Security Standards Requiring Context of Organisation

Standard / Regulation	Core Focus	Contextual Requirement
ISO 27001	Information Security Management Systems (ISMS)	Mandatory under Clause 4.1 to define the strategic ISMS boundaries.
GDPR	Data Protection & Privacy (EU/UK)	Requires understanding the legal context of data processing and territorial scope.
CCPA	Consumer Privacy (California)	Necessitates identifying the business’s role in the consumer data ecosystem.
DORA	Financial Sector Resilience	Requires context on critical functions and third-party ICT dependencies.
NIS2	Critical Infrastructure Security	Context is vital for identifying ‘Essential’ or ‘Important’ entity status.
SOC 2	Trust Services Criteria	System Description (DC 200) requires context on system boundaries and user needs.
NIST	Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)	The ‘Identify’ (ID.AM) function hinges on understanding organisational context.
HIPAA	Healthcare Data Security	Requires context of the ‘Covered Entity’ or ‘Business Associate’ relationship.

Relevant ISO 27001:2022 Controls

The ISO 27001:2022 standard has several controls related to context of organisation:

ISO 27001:2022 Controls and Clauses Linked to Context of the Organisation

ISO 27001 Clause	Title & Link	Relationship to Context (Clause 4.1)
Clause 4.2	Understanding The Needs And Expectations of Interested Parties	Identifies the stakeholders whose requirements define the external factors and boundaries of the ISMS.
Clause 9.3	Management Review	Ensures top management reviews changes in internal and external issues to keep the organisation’s context current.

Examples of ISO 27001 Internal Issues

ISO 27001 Internal Issues are the things internal to the organisation that could impact the information security management system. These are typically in the control of the organisation and the organisation is often able to influence them directly.

If we consider examples of internal issues we can consider the following:

• Competent Resources: The organisation must ensure it possesses the necessary skilled and experienced personnel required to effectively operate and maintain the Information Security Management System (ISMS).
• Leadership Buy-in: Securing active support and commitment from the board, shareholders, and leadership team is critical for the long-term success and integration of security objectives.
• Governance Framework: Implementing an effective internal governance structure provides the necessary oversight and accountability required to manage information security risks and compliance.

ISO 27001 Internal Issues for small businesses

Small businesses often face internal issues related to a lack of dedicated resources and formal processes.

ISO 27001 Internal Issues Analysis for Small Businesses

Internal Issue Category	Contextual Impact & Definition	Typical Small Business Challenge
Resources and Budget	Financial and human capital availability for ISMS maintenance.	Lack of a dedicated information security team or budget for tools, training, and external auditors.
Processes and Documentation	Formalisation of security governance and accountability.	Absence of documented policies and procedures, leading to inconsistent security management and accountability.
Awareness and Training	Human-centric security culture and risk mitigation.	Weak security-conscious culture and insufficient training, increasing vulnerability to social engineering and phishing.
Third-Party Reliance	Supply chain and cloud service security dependency.	Heavy reliance on SaaS/Cloud providers without adequate due diligence or verification of the provider’s security controls.

ISO 27001 Internal Issues for tech startup

Tech startups, with their rapid growth and focus on innovation, have unique internal issues.

ISO 27001 Internal Issues Analysis for Tech Startups

Startup Internal Issue	Operational Impact & Risks	Strategic Consequence
Rapid Growth & Structural Lag	Scaling pace outstrips security maturity; roles and responsibilities remain undefined.	Chaotic governance and inconsistent security implementation.
Resource Miscalculation	Certification is viewed as a “one-off” project rather than a continuous lifecycle.	Degradation of security posture post-audit and compliance failure.
Leadership Buy-In Deficit	Security is relegated to a low-priority “IT issue” instead of a business enabler.	Insufficient funding and poor company-wide culture of security.
Generic Control Adoption	Applying “one-size-fits-all” controls without tailoring to specific risks.	Wasted operational effort and ineffective risk mitigation.
Incomplete Risk Assessment	Failure to identify and prioritise threats to “crown jewels” like source code or customer data.	Critical security vulnerabilities left unaddressed and exposed.

ISO 27001 Internal Issues for ai companies

AI companies have all the same issues as tech startups, but they also face unique, AI-specific internal challenges.

ISO 27001 Internal Issues Analysis for AI Companies

AI Internal Issue	Technical Impact & Security Risks	Organisational Consequence
Data Provenance & Integrity	Risks of data poisoning where malicious data injection compromises model training quality.	Compromised model integrity leading to harmful or inaccurate outputs.
Model Lifecycle Management	Lack of secure integration for training and deployment within the development lifecycle; difficult to audit.	Unmanaged vulnerabilities and poor accountability for model behaviour changes.
Bias & Explainability	The “black box” nature of AI prevents clear decision-making explanations and bias mitigation.	Discriminatory outcomes and significant risks to regulatory compliance and accountability.
Shadow AI Deployments	Unauthorised employee use of public LLMs and rogue AI tools without governance.	Accidental exposure of sensitive company data and intellectual property.
Lack of AI Risk Management	Applying generic controls that fail to address adversarial attacks or model inversion threats.	Ineffective protection against unique AI-specific technical threats.

Examples of ISO 27001 External Issues

ISO 27001 External Issues are the things external to the organisation that could impact the information security management system. These are typically outside the control of the organisation and the organisation is often unable to influence them directly.

If we consider examples of internal issues we can consider the following:

• Legal and Regulatory Requirements: Organisations must identify and comply with evolving statutory, contractual, and regulatory obligations that govern information security and data protection.
• The Economy: Fluctuations in the economic climate can influence security budgets, investment in technology, and the overall financial stability of the ISMS.
• Workforce Availability: The availability of a skilled and effective workforce impacts the organisation’s ability to maintain technical availability and operational security standards.
• Competitors: Rivalry and market shifts within the industry can dictate new security benchmarks and influence the risk landscape regarding intellectual property and market position.
• Global Politics: Geopolitical instability and international relations can lead to emerging cyber threats, supply chain disruptions, and changes in trade sanctions.

ISO 27001 External Issues for small businesses

Small businesses are highly susceptible to external pressures, often lacking the resources to absorb shocks or quickly adapt to change.

ISO 27001 External Issues Analysis for Small Businesses

External Issue Category	Contextual Pressure & Impact	Specific Small Business Risk
Regulatory and Legal	Compliance with evolving data protection laws such as GDPR or CCPA.	Catastrophic financial fines resulting from a lack of resources to absorb regulatory shocks.
Customer and Market	Demands from larger clients requiring proof of a robust security posture.	Contractual necessity for ISO 27001 certification or the forced adoption of costly secure platforms.
Cyber Threat Landscape	Opportunistic targeting by cybercriminals due to perceived weaker defences.	Constant exposure to phishing and ransomware, requiring frequent and costly security updates.
Supply Chain Risk	High dependency on a network of third-party suppliers and cloud partners.	Security is only as strong as the weakest link; breaches at a provider can compromise the entire business.

ISO 27001 Internal Issues for tech startup

Tech startups operate in a fast-paced environment where competitive and technological pressures are key external issues.

ISO 27001 External Issues Analysis for Tech Startups

External Issue Category	Contextual Pressure & Impact	Strategic Startup Risk
Intense Competition	Crowded market dynamics where rivals may exploit security failures for competitive gain.	Reputational damage and potential corporate espionage targeting intellectual property.
Rapid Technological Change	Swift obsolescence of tech stacks and the introduction of unproven, high-risk technologies.	Difficulty in maintaining effective security as legacy vulnerabilities emerge and new tech remains unvetted.
Investor & Partner Expectations	High scrutiny during due diligence; security is a prerequisite for funding and growth.	Failure to secure investment or partnerships without ISO 27001 as a baseline for trust.
Open Source & Third-Party Dependencies	Heavy reliance on external libraries and APIs over which the startup has no direct control.	Immediate exposure to critical zero-day vulnerabilities (e.g., Log4j) requiring rapid, reactive remediation.

ISO 27001 Internal Issues for ai companies

AI companies face a unique set of external issues, particularly related to the rapidly developing regulatory and ethical landscape of artificial intelligence.

ISO 27001 External Issues Analysis for AI Companies

External Issue Category	Contextual Pressure & Impact	AI-Specific Security Risk
Evolving AI Regulations	Global introduction of laws like the EU AI Act governing data and algorithms.	Mandatory requirements for data governance, transparency, and bias mitigation with severe penalties for non-compliance.
Public Perception & Ethics	Fragile public trust and potential for reputational damage following high-profile AI misuse.	External pressure to adhere to strict ethical guidelines and advanced security best practices to maintain brand integrity.
Adversarial Attacks	Intentional external manipulation of AI models by malicious actors.	Critical threats such as data poisoning or adversarial evasion designed to corrupt model outputs.
Data Scarcity & Sourcing	Dependency on high-quality datasets involving complex external contractual relationships.	Legal and privacy risks regarding the ethical collection and lawful processing of training data from third-party providers.

Examples of ISO 27001 Interested Parties

ISO 27001 Interested Parties are the people, both internal and external to the organisation, that have requirements and expectations on the information security management system. Their requirements may require changes to the information security management system and the information security controls that are implemented.

Examples of ISO 27001 Interested Parties

• Shareholders: These internal stakeholders demand financial stability and risk mitigation to protect their investments and ensure long-term business resilience.
• Customers: External clients require assurance that their sensitive data is handled securely and in accordance with contractual privacy obligations.
• Staff: Employees expect clear security guidelines, personal data protection, and a safe digital working environment to perform their roles effectively.
• Regulators: External bodies oversee compliance with industry-specific security standards and have the authority to enforce operational transparency.
• Law Makers: Legislative entities establish the statutory framework, such as GDPR or NIS2, that dictates mandatory security and privacy requirements.
• Auditors: Independent professionals evaluate the ISMS to verify that security controls are implemented effectively and meet the requirements of ISO 27001.

ISO 27001 Interested Parties for small businesses

For small businesses, interested parties are often straightforward and directly tied to the company’s daily operations and survival.

ISO 27001 Interested Parties Analysis for Small Businesses

Interested Party	Requirements and Expectations	Impact on ISMS
Customers	Expect high levels of confidentiality and data security for personal/financial info.	Acts as a primary driver for certification to build market trust and competitive advantage.
Employees and Contractors	Require clear security policies and the protection of their own personal HR records.	Necessitates internal training, awareness programmes, and secure internal data processing.
Suppliers and Service Providers	Depend on clear communication of security requirements and uphold contractual obligations.	Requires robust third-party risk management and clear security clauses in service level agreements.
Regulators and Government Agencies	Enforce legal compliance with frameworks such as GDPR or CCPA to protect data subjects.	Mandates legal and regulatory mapping to avoid significant financial penalties and legal action.
Auditors and Certification Bodies	Expect comprehensive documented processes, evidence of control effectiveness, and transparency.	Drives the need for internal audits and continuous improvement of documentation and evidence logs.

ISO 27001 Interested Parties for tech startup

Tech startups have a similar set of interested parties to small businesses, but with a greater emphasis on growth, scalability, and intellectual property protection.

ISO 27001 Interested Parties Analysis for Tech Startups

Interested Party	Requirements and Expectations	Impact on ISMS Strategy
Investors & VCs	Expect a mature security posture to protect company valuation and investment longevity.	Certification is often a non-negotiable due diligence requirement for funding rounds.
Enterprise Customers	Demand rigorous proof of security controls and vendor risk management compliance.	Necessitates the use of ISO 27001 to bypass lengthy security questionnaires and win high-value contracts.
Partners & Integrators	Require assurance that shared data, brand reputation, and IP remain secure during system integration.	Drives the need for secure API management and collaborative security governance models.
Development Community	Expect responsible contribution to open-source and rapid patching of software dependencies.	Influences the Secure Software Development Lifecycle (SSDLC) and vulnerability disclosure policies.
Competitors	Monitor security incidents to gain market advantage; affected by industry-wide shifts in trust.	Highlighting security as a competitive differentiator to prevent rivals from exploiting perceived weaknesses.

ISO 27001 Interested Parties for ai companies

AI companies have all the interested parties of a typical tech startup but also face a unique set of stakeholders related to the ethical and societal impacts of their technology.

ISO 27001 Interested Parties Analysis for AI Companies

Interested Party	Requirements and Expectations	ISMS & Security Impact
Data Providers & Subjects	Assurance of data protection, lawful processing, and the right to be forgotten.	Drives the need for robust data governance, consent management, and privacy-by-design.
Ethical Boards & Ethicists	Transparency in algorithms and active mitigation of algorithmic bias and unfair outcomes.	Requires accountability frameworks and technical controls for model explainability.
Civil Society & The Public	Responsible societal impact regarding jobs, privacy, and general AI behaviour.	Forces a focus on brand reputation management and ethical risk assessments.
Researchers & Academics	Adversarial security perspective; identification of model vulnerabilities and weaknesses.	Necessitates proactive vulnerability disclosure programmes and adversarial testing.
AI Regulatory Bodies	Compliance with emerging AI governance standards (e.g. EU AI Act).	Directly dictates ISMS design, operational standards, and mandatory reporting.

ISO 27001 Context of Organisation Example

This is a great example of the ISO 27001 Context of Organisation . Taking the first 3 pages being the contents of what it includes. You can also view a detailed

SWOT vs PESTLE for ISO 27001 Context Analysis

While ISO 27001 does not mandate a specific methodology, using SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) and PESTLE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, Environmental) ensures a comprehensive capture of internal and external issues.

Remote-First vs Hybrid: ISO 27001 Context Comparison

In 2026, the distinction between Remote-First (virtual-only) and Hybrid (office + home) is a primary focus for ISO 27001 auditors. While both models rely on Clause 4.1 to define the ISMS context, they present vastly different internal issues and technical boundaries that directly impact your risk assessment and control selection.

ISO 27001 Context Register: 2026 AI Skills Gap Analysis

ISO 27001 Context of Organisation FAQ

About the author