ISO 27001 Annex A 8.26 Audit Checklist

The ultimate audit guide to ISO 27001 Annex A 8.26 Application Security Requirements

1. Verify the Information Security Requirements Formalisation

Verification Criteria: Specific security requirements for applications are documented and approved during the initial specification and design phases.

Required Evidence: Software Requirement Specifications (SRS) or Design Documents containing explicit security-functional and non-functional requirements.

Pass/Fail Test: If an application was developed or procured without a formalised list of security requirements (e.g., encryption, session handling), mark as Non-Compliant.

2. Confirm Authentication and Access Control Requirements

Verification Criteria: Requirements for robust authentication (including MFA) and granular role-based access control (RBAC) are defined for all application user tiers.

Required Evidence: Application architecture diagrams or access control matrices specifying required login factors and permission levels.

Pass/Fail Test: If the application design allows for single-factor authentication for administrative functions or lacks granular permission logic, mark as Non-Compliant.

3. Validate Data Input Sanitisation and Validation

Verification Criteria: Technical requirements for the validation and sanitisation of all user-supplied data are documented to prevent common injection attacks.

Required Evidence: Secure Coding Standard or API Documentation specifying input validation parameters and regex filters.

Pass/Fail Test: If there is no documented requirement for input sanitisation (e.g., against SQLi or XSS) in the application design, mark as Non-Compliant.

ISO 27001 Toolkit Business Edition

4. Verify Cryptographic Protection Requirements

Verification Criteria: Requirements for protecting sensitive data at rest and in transit within the application are defined, specifying algorithms and key management rules.

Required Evidence: Data Classification Policy and Application Security Design documents citing TLS versions and AES-256 (or equivalent) standards.

Pass/Fail Test: If the application design does not specify the encryption protocols for sensitive data fields or database volumes, mark as Non-Compliant.

5. Confirm Application Logging and Audit Trail Requirements

Verification Criteria: Requirements for generating, protecting, and reviewing application-level audit logs are explicitly defined.

Required Evidence: Logging Standard or Technical Specification identifying mandatory event types to be logged (e.g., login failure, data modification).

Pass/Fail Test: If the application is incapable of logging user activity or if logging requirements were never specified, mark as Non-Compliant.

6. Validate Error Handling and Information Leakage Prevention

Verification Criteria: Requirements are defined to ensure that application error messages do not reveal sensitive system or technical information to end-users.

Required Evidence: UI/UX Design specs or Error Handling Procedures specifying generic user-facing messages vs. detailed internal logs.

Pass/Fail Test: If an application in production reveals stack traces, database versions, or server paths in public error messages, mark as Non-Compliant.

7. Check the Secure Session Management Implementation

Verification Criteria: Technical requirements for session timeouts, concurrent login limits, and secure token handling (e.g., HttpOnly/Secure flags) are documented.

Required Evidence: Web Application Firewall (WAF) configuration logs or session management policy documentation.

Pass/Fail Test: If session tokens are found in URL parameters or lack a mandatory expiration timeout in the application configuration, mark as Non-Compliant.

8. Ensure Supply Chain and Third-Party Component Security

Verification Criteria: Requirements exist to verify the security of integrated third-party components, APIs, and libraries used by the application.

Required Evidence: Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) or Third-Party Security Assessment reports for integrated services.

Pass/Fail Test: If the organisation cannot produce a list of third-party libraries used in the application or has no record of assessing their security, mark as Non-Compliant.

9. Validate Availability and Resilience Requirements

Verification Criteria: Technical requirements for high availability, backup frequency, and disaster recovery are defined for the application service.

Required Evidence: Business Continuity Plan (BCP) or Service Level Agreement (SLA) specifying target RTO and RPO for the application.

Pass/Fail Test: If an application identified as ‘Critical’ has no documented requirement for redundancy or failover testing, mark as Non-Compliant.

10. Evidence that Security Testing and Certification Records are Present

Verification Criteria: The application has undergone formal security testing (e.g., Pentest or DAST) to verify that the identified requirements have been met.

Required Evidence: Signed Vulnerability Assessment reports or Penetration Testing Remediation logs showing all critical findings closed.

Pass/Fail Test: If a production application has not undergone a security test in the last 12 months or since its last major release, mark as Non-Compliant.

About the author

Stuart Barker
🎓 MSc Security 🛡️ Lead Auditor 30+ Years Exp 🏢 Ex-GE Leader

Stuart Barker

ISO 27001 Ninja

Stuart Barker is a veteran practitioner with over 30 years of experience in systems security and risk management. Holding an MSc in Software and Systems Security, he combines academic rigor with extensive operational experience, including a decade leading Data Governance for General Electric (GE).

As a qualified ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, Stuart possesses distinct insight into the specific evidence standards required by certification bodies. His toolkits represent an auditor-verified methodology designed to minimise operational friction while guaranteeing compliance.

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top