ISO 27001:2022 Clause 7.3 Awareness for AI Companies

ISO 27001 Clause 7.3 for AI Companies

ISO 27001 Clause 7.3 Awareness is a security control that mandates ensuring all personnel understand their roles within the Information Security Management System. The primary implementation requirement involves systematic training and communication, providing the business benefit of a resilient human firewall against social engineering and data leaks.

For companies operating at the forefront of Artificial Intelligence, value is built upon two core pillars: vast repositories of data and highly proprietary algorithms. Protecting these assets is not just an IT function; it is a fundamental business imperative. In the landscape of information security standards, ISO 27001 Clause 7.3 Awareness is often mistaken for a simple compliance hurdle. This view is a critical miscalculation.

For an AI company, Clause 7.3 is the cultural foundation upon which the security of your intellectual property, the integrity of your models, and the trust of your clients are built. It stops your Junior Dev from pasting API keys into ChatGPT.

ISO 27001 Toolkit

The “No-BS” Translation: Decoding the Requirement

Let’s strip away the academic language and look at what this actually means for a 25-year-old DevOps engineer or an ML Researcher.

The Auditor’s View (ISO 27001)The AI Company View (Reality)
“Persons doing work under the organisation’s control shall be aware of the information security policy.”Don’t make them read a 50-page PDF. Create a Notion or Confluence page titled “How not to get us sued” covering the basics: Password Managers, MFA, and Clean Desk.
“Aware of their contribution to the effectiveness of the information security management system.”Engineers need to know that locking their MacBook and using VPNs keeps the training data safe. If they ship insecure code, the company dies.
“Aware of the implications of not conforming with the information security management system requirements.”If you paste customer data into a public LLM or leave an S3 bucket open, you will be fired. It is that simple.

The Business Case: Why This Actually Matters for AI Companies

Most technical founders view “Awareness Training” as a waste of billable hours. This is a mistake. Clause 7.3 is about risk reduction and closing deals.

The Sales Angle

Enterprise clients send 300-question security questionnaires. They will ask: “Do you conduct annual security awareness training and phishing simulations?” If you answer “No,” you are flagged as high risk. If you answer “Yes” but can’t prove it with logs, you lose the contract. Compliance is often the tie-breaker in competitive AI tenders.

The Risk Angle

The biggest threat to an AI company is not a sophisticated zero-day exploit; it is a developer being socially engineered. Ransomware gangs target employees, not firewalls. Effective awareness training prevents the “oops” moment where an employee clicks a link that encrypts your entire model registry.

DORA, NIS2 and AI Regulation: The Human Firewall

New regulations like DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) and NIS2 place a heavy emphasis on the “Human Factor.”

  • DORA: Requires mandatory security training for all employees, including senior management. You must prove your Board understands cyber risk.
  • NIS2: Focuses on “Cyber Hygiene.” This includes awareness of supply chain attacks—critical for AI companies importing libraries from PyPi or Hugging Face.
  • EU AI Act: Requires human oversight of AI systems. Your team must be “aware” of the ethical and security boundaries of the models they are building. Clause 7.3 is the mechanism to document this competency.

ISO 27001 Toolkit vs SaaS Platforms: The Awareness Trap

SaaS platforms will try to sell you a “built-in” Learning Management System (LMS) with generic cartoons about passwords. This is often expensive shelf-ware. Here is why the ISO 27001 Toolkit is the superior choice for Clause 7.3.

FeatureISO 27001 Toolkit (Hightable.io)Online SaaS Platform
OwnershipYou own the training materials. Customise the slide decks to include your specific AI risks (e.g., Data Poisoning).You rent generic videos. If you stop paying, you lose your training records and the content.
SimplicityPowerPoint & PDF. Everyone knows how to use them. Upload them to your existing HR tool or Google Drive.Another login. Employees hate logging into a separate “GRC Portal” just to watch a 5-minute video.
CostOne-off fee. Includes training templates. No “per user” pricing that penalises you for growing.Expensive subscriptions. They charge you $10-$20 per user/month for content you could find on YouTube.
FreedomNo Lock-in. Switch HR platforms whenever you want. Your training records are just Excel files/PDFs you control.Data Hostage. Trying to export training logs from a proprietary SaaS tool during an audit is a nightmare.

Decoding Clause 7.3: The Three Pillars of Information Security Awareness

Before building an effective awareness programme, it is essential to understand the precise requirements of Clause 7.3. The standard is not prescriptive about how you create awareness, but it is very clear about what people must be aware of. Dissecting the language of the clause reveals three actionable pillars that must form the core of any compliant programme.

According to the standard, all individuals working under the organisation’s control must be made aware of the following:

  • The Information Security Policy: This goes beyond simply acknowledging that a policy document exists. Everyone must be aware of the organisation’s high-level security policy and have a clear understanding of its contents and objectives.
  • Their Contribution to Security: Personnel must understand how their individual actions and behaviours directly contribute to the overall effectiveness of the ISMS. This includes grasping the benefits of improved security performance—such as protecting company assets and client data—and recognising that their diligence is a critical component of the organisation’s security posture.
  • The Implications of Non-Conformance: It is vital that staff understand the potential consequences of failing to adhere to the ISMS requirements. This includes not only the business impact of a security breach—such as reputational damage or financial loss—but also the personal disciplinary actions they might face.

The AI Imperative: Why Clause 7.3 is Non-Negotiable for Your Business

While Clause 7.3 is a universal requirement for any organisation seeking ISO 27001 certification, its strategic importance is dramatically amplified within the AI sector. The unique nature of your assets, the scale of your data processing, and the very function of your products create high-stakes scenarios where a lack of awareness can have catastrophic consequences.

  • Protecting Proprietary Models and Algorithms: A single instance of carelessness—such as an engineer discussing a novel architecture in a public forum or accidentally uploading sensitive code to a personal repository—could lead to the irreparable loss of your core intellectual property.
  • Securing Sensitive Training Data: AI models are trained on massive datasets, which often contain sensitive, personal, or commercially valuable information. A breach of this data is not just a technical failure; it’s a profound breach of trust that can lead to severe regulatory fines (e.g., under GDPR) and devastating reputational damage.
  • Preventing Misuse and Ensuring Ethical AI: Your information security policy defines the guardrails for the responsible and ethical use of your AI systems. Awareness is the first line of defence in ensuring these systems are used as intended.

Your Step-by-Step Implementation Plan for a Security-Aware Culture

Building a successful awareness programme that satisfies Clause 7.3 is a systematic process, not a one-time event. This section provides an actionable roadmap AI companies can follow to establish, maintain, and continually improve a culture of security awareness. Check out the High Table ISO 27001 Toolkit for templates to streamline this process.

Assign Clear Ownership

Designate a specific individual to be responsible for the organisation’s awareness activities. This role, often held by an Information Security Officer (ISO), is accountable for planning, executing, and overseeing the entire programme.

Develop Your Awareness Programme

Create a formal plan that outlines the topics to be covered, the target audiences, and the delivery methods. A multi-faceted approach is most effective. Utilise a variety of engaging materials and formats to keep the content fresh and memorable, such as:

  • Training presentations and videos
  • Posters and infographics in common areas
  • Security tips in company newsletters or emails
  • Simulated phishing attacks to test and reinforce learning

Integrate Awareness Across the Employee Lifecycle

Awareness is not just an annual training module; it should be woven into the fabric of an individual’s journey with your company.

  • Onboarding: New hires are a critical audience. The onboarding process must include a dedicated session covering the information security policy, key procedures, and their personal security responsibilities.
  • Continuous Awareness: Conduct formal refresher training for all personnel at least annually. Supplement this with ongoing, risk-based campaigns. For example, launch targeted campaigns on emerging risks, such as the acceptable use of third-party generative AI tools to prevent proprietary code leakage.
  • Offboarding: The offboarding process should include a clear communication of any ongoing contractual and confidentiality obligations regarding information security.

The Evidence Locker: What the Auditor Needs to See

When the audit comes, you need to prove that “Awareness” isn’t just a vibe. You need artifacts. Collect these before your Stage 2 audit to ensure a smooth process.

  • Onboarding Checklist: Evidence that new hires read the Information Security Policy on Day 1.
  • Training Logs: A simple export from your HR system or a manually maintained spreadsheet listing: Name, Date, Training Topic, and Result.
  • Communication Samples: Screenshots of Slack/Teams announcements regarding security updates (e.g., “Urgent: Update Chrome now”).
  • Phishing Simulation Reports: A report showing you tested your staff, including the “Click Rate” and remedial training for those who failed.
  • Induction Slides: The actual deck you present to new starters. The auditor will review the content to ensure it covers the policy.

Common Pitfalls & Auditor Traps

Do not fall into these traps. These are the most common reasons AI companies receive non-conformities for Clause 7.3.

  • The “Dev Exempt” Error: You trained sales and HR, but the Engineering team was “too busy shipping code” and skipped it. This is a Major Non-Conformity. Engineers are your highest risk user group.
  • The “Click-Through” Fatigue: You use a tool that forces users to click “Next” 50 times. Staff ignore the content. Auditors test this by asking staff simple questions like “Who do you report a breach to?” If they don’t know, your training failed.
  • The “Ghost” Contractor: You forgot to train the freelancers or contractors who have access to your repositories. If they have access, they need awareness training.

Handling Exceptions: The “Break Glass” Protocol

Sometimes, a contractor or partner needs access now and cannot wait for the full 2-hour induction. You need a process for this.

The Interim Awareness Workflow:

  • Approval: CTO or CISO approves the exception.
  • Condensed Briefing: A 10-minute read of the “Acceptable Use Policy” and “NDA.”
  • Documentation: Log a ticket in Jira/Linear: “Exception: [Name] granted access. Full training scheduled for [Date].”
  • Constraint: Limit their access (Least Privilege) until full training is complete.

The Process Layer: “The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)”

  • Step 1: Onboarding (Automated). When a new user is added to Google Workspace, trigger an email with the “Information Security 101” slides (PDF) and a Google Form for acknowledgement.
  • Step 2: Verification (Manual). HR/Ops checks the Google Sheet responses weekly. If a new hire hasn’t signed, they poke them on Slack.
  • Step 3: Continuous Updates (Manual). The CISO posts a “Security Snippet” in the #general Slack channel once a month (e.g., “New phishing trend alert”). Screenshot this for evidence.
  • Step 4: Annual Refresh (Automated). Set a recurring calendar invite for “Annual Security Refresher.” Use a Google Form quiz to track completion.
  • Step 5: Incident-Triggered Training (Manual). If someone fails a phishing test or causes a minor incident, create a private Linear ticket for “Remedial Training” and assign it to their manager.

About the author

Stuart Barker
🎓 MSc Security 🛡️ Lead Auditor 30+ Years Exp 🏢 Ex-GE Leader

Stuart Barker

ISO 27001 Ninja

Stuart Barker is a veteran practitioner with over 30 years of experience in systems security and risk management. Holding an MSc in Software and Systems Security, he combines academic rigor with extensive operational experience, including a decade leading Data Governance for General Electric (GE).

As a qualified ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, Stuart possesses distinct insight into the specific evidence standards required by certification bodies. His toolkits represent an auditor-verified methodology designed to minimise operational friction while guaranteeing compliance.

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top