ISO 27001:2022 Clause 7.1 Resources for AI Companies

ISO 27001 Annex A 7.1 For AI Companies

For any ambitious AI company, navigating the world of information security standards can seem daunting. It is easy to view a requirement like ISO 27001 Clause 7.1 as just another bureaucratic hurdle to clear. However, this perspective misses a crucial point: properly resourcing your Information Security Management System (ISMS) is not about compliance for its own sake.

It is the strategic foundation upon which you build trust with clients, protect your invaluable intellectual property—like proprietary algorithms, training datasets, and model integrity and enable scalable, secure growth.

This guide breaks down Clause 7.1 into practical, actionable steps specifically for high-growth tech companies. We will explore what resources are truly needed, who should be involved, and how you can confidently prove your commitment to an auditor, transforming this mandatory clause into a competitive advantage.


Understanding Clause 7.1: The Foundation of Your ISMS

Clause 7.1 is a mandatory requirement of the ISO 27001 standard and the essential starting point for any successful ISMS. Its importance cannot be overstated; without the proper determination and provision of resources, even the best-laid security plans are destined to fail. Think of it as the bedrock that supports the entire structure of your information security programme.

The official definition of ISO 27001:2022 Clause 7.1 Resources states:

“The organisation shall determine and provide the resources needed for the establishment, implementation, maintenance and continual improvement of the information security management system.”

At its core, the purpose of this clause is to ensure your company formally dedicates the necessary support for the ISMS to be effective. This is not just a one-time allocation for the initial certification project. The standard demands a commitment to resourcing the ISMS throughout its entire lifecycle, from the first day of establishment through ongoing maintenance and continual improvement.

Deconstructing ‘Resources’: The Three Pillars of Support

A common mistake when approaching Clause 7.1 is to think only in terms of budget. While financial allocation is critical, the ISO 27001 standard requires a far more comprehensive approach. True compliance rests on three distinct but interconnected pillars: people, infrastructure, and finances.

Human Resources: Your Security Champions

Let us be clear: Your people are the most critical security resource you will allocate. An ISMS is not an automated system; it is a management framework run by competent individuals. This means identifying and providing people who possess the right combination of skills, knowledge, and, crucially, the time to manage the ISMS effectively. These responsibilities can be fulfilled by dedicated internal staff, expert external consultants, or a strategic combination of both.

Infrastructure and Tools: Your ISMS Engine

Beyond people, you must provide the right infrastructure to support their work. This includes the necessary IT systems, software, and physical facilities required for your ISMS to operate, such as the secure cloud-based GPU clusters that power your AI development. A key example of such a resource is an ISO 27001 Toolkit, which provides a foundational set of policies, templates, checklists, and guides. These toolkits are force multipliers; they provide the structure that enables a small, competent team to manage the entire ISMS effectively without having to create hundreds of documents from scratch.

Financial Resources: Fuelling the Initiative

Finally, a sufficient budget is essential to fuel the entire initiative. This financial commitment must be planned to cover all aspects of the ISMS lifecycle. Key expenditures include licensing for tools (like the aforementioned toolkit), funding for professional development such as ISO 27001 Lead Auditor training or Lead Implementor training to upskill your staff, and fees for any external expertise you may require, such as specialist consultants or certification auditors.

Building Your ISMS Team: Roles and Responsibilities

Defining and formally assigning roles is a mandatory requirement for proving compliance. For an AI company where innovation moves quickly, establishing clear roles ensures that accountability for security is never ambiguous and that critical tasks are executed efficiently.

The standard requires that certain mandatory people resources are allocated. These roles form the leadership and management core of your ISMS:

  • The CEO
  • The Leadership Team
  • Information Security Management Leadership
  • The Information Security Manager
  • The Management Review Team

To formalise this structure, you should leverage a template like an “Information Security Roles and Assigned Responsibilities” document. This resource provides a pre-defined list of all the roles required by the ISMS, sets out their accountabilities, and allows you to simply assign your people to these functions, ensuring no mandatory role is overlooked.

Can one person have more than one role? especially in smaller organisations? The answer is yes, this is perfectly acceptable. It is common for one or two key individuals in a startup or small business to be assigned multiple controls and responsibilities. However, this flexibility comes with a critical caveat: you must maintain Segregation of Duty. In practice, this means that the same person who requests authority for an action should not be the person who authorises it. This principle is fundamental to preventing conflicts of interest and unauthorised changes.

A Phased Approach to Resource Allocation

Resource allocation is not a static, one-time event. It is a dynamic process that should adapt as your ISMS matures. Deploying the right mix of internal staff and external specialists at the right time is key to an efficient and successful implementation. The following roadmap outlines a strategic approach to resource deployment across the project’s lifecycle.

  • Establishment Phase: Use a specialist resource to ensure your ISMS foundation is built correctly from day one. Their expertise prevents costly structural errors and ensures your scope and policies are perfectly aligned with the standard’s requirements, saving significant rework later.
  • Implementation Phase: Continue with a specialist resource to leverage their pre-built templates and proven methodologies. This makes the implementation leaner and faster, dramatically reducing the time-to-certification and freeing up your internal teams to focus on core AI development.
  • Certification Phase: This phase is best handled with a combination of specialist resources and your own staff. The certification audit is a partnership where your team demonstrates ownership of the ISMS with the guidance and support of an experienced consultant.
  • Maintenance Phase: For ongoing maintenance, the goal is to use your own trained staff. A specialist resource can be retained to perform periodic “sense-checks” on your work, ensuring you stay on track without the cost of a full-time engagement.
  • Continual Improvement Phase: Smaller organisations can effectively manage this phase using their own staff, with support from a specialist for sense-checking and conducting internal audits. This ensures objectivity and keeps you prepared for surveillance and recertification audits.

Demonstrating Compliance: The Documentation Auditors Need to See

In an ISO 27001 audit, undocumented claims are meaningless. Auditors require tangible, documented evidence that you have thoughtfully identified, planned for, and provided the necessary resources for your ISMS. Two key documents are essential for this purpose.

The Accountability Matrix (RACI)

The ISO 27001 Accountability Matrix is a powerful tool for demonstrating clear ownership. This document lists every standard clause and Annex A control and answers two simple but critical questions for each: Who is Accountable (where the buck stops) and who is Responsible (the person or team doing the work). This eliminates ambiguity and proves to an auditor that every requirement has a designated owner.

For organisations seeking more granular detail, an advanced RACI Matrix can be used. This expands the model to also identify who must be Consulted, who should be Informed, and who provides Support for each item.

The Competency Matrix

The Competency Matrix serves as the primary record for your human resources. This tool is used to list all the people involved in the ISMS—from your data scientists to your operations team—and formally demonstrate that they possess the required competencies for their assigned roles. It also serves a strategic purpose by highlighting any training gaps that need to be addressed, ensuring your team’s skills remain current and effective.

Passing the Clause 7.1 Audit: What to Expect

By following the steps outlined in this guide, you can confidently approach the Clause 7.1 audit. The process is straightforward and focuses on verifying that your commitment to resourcing the ISMS is both genuine and documented.

Key Steps to Pass the Audit

  • Understand the requirements of ISO 27001 Clause 7.1.
  • Identify the resources that you need across people, infrastructure, and finances.
  • Acquire the necessary People Resources, whether internal or external.
  • Get an Information Security Management System (ISMS), such as a toolkit with templates and guides.
  • Assess the competency of the people involved.
  • Address any competency gaps through training or by bringing in specialist help.

What the Auditor Will Check

An auditor will focus on several key areas to verify your compliance with Clause 7.1.

  • Knowledge of ISO 27001: The auditor will verify that someone involved in your ISMS has the necessary knowledge and experience of the standard itself. This is a basic but often overlooked requirement.
  • Staff Competence: The auditor will check that the people assigned to various roles are competent to perform them. Documents like the Competency Matrix will be used as primary evidence here.
  • Resource Allocation: The auditor will review your Statement of Applicability (SoA) and ensure that resources have been allocated to every ISMS requirement and Annex A control you have deemed applicable. It is not enough to say you do something; you must prove you have the resources allocated to ensure it gets done.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Has Clause 7.1 changed in the latest ISO 27001:2022 update?

No, there are no changes to ISO 27001 Clause 7.1 in the 2022 version of the standard.

Who is ultimately responsible for ensuring Clause 7.1 is met?

Senior management is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the resources required by Clause 7.1 are provided and maintained.

Can we use external consultants to satisfy resource requirements?

Yes, absolutely. External resources like consultants, managed service providers, and outsourced IT services can be used to meet the requirements. The organisation remains responsible for managing these external resources effectively.

What are the most common mistakes companies make when implementing this clause?

Common mistakes include allocating an insufficient budget, not providing enough staff time for ISMS activities, failing to get formal buy-in from top management, and not documenting how resources are identified and provided.

What is the difference between Clause 7.1 (Resources) and Clause 7.2 (Competence)?

Clause 7.1 focuses on the availability of resources in general, such as budget, technology, and people. Clause 7.2, in contrast, specifically addresses the competence of those people. It requires you to ensure that individuals working within the ISMS have the necessary skills and knowledge for their specific roles.

How does Clause 7.1 relate to the continual improvement of our security?

Clause 7.1 is critical for continual improvement. It ensures you have the resources not just to implement the ISMS, but also to maintain and improve it over time by funding regular audits, corrective actions, and new security initiatives as your risks evolve.


Conclusion: Resourcing as a Strategic Advantage

For a forward-thinking AI company, mastering ISO 27001 Clause 7.1 is far more than a compliance exercise. It is a declaration of your commitment to security and operational excellence. By thoughtfully determining and providing the necessary people, tools, and financial support, you are not just building an ISMS—you are building a resilient security posture. This foundation will protect your critical assets, earn the unwavering trust of your clients, and ultimately support your company’s long-term, sustainable success in a competitive market.

Stuart Barker
🎓 MSc Security 🛡️ Lead Auditor ⚡ 30+ Years Exp 🏢 Ex-GE Leader

Stuart Barker

Stuart Barker is a veteran practitioner with over 30 years of experience in systems security and risk management. Holding an MSc in Software and Systems Security, he combines academic rigor with extensive operational experience, including a decade leading Data Governance for General Electric (GE).

As a qualified ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, Stuart possesses distinct insight into the specific evidence standards required by certification bodies. His toolkits represent an auditor-verified methodology designed to minimise operational friction while guaranteeing compliance.

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top