ISO 27001 Clause 5.3 for AI Companies: Organisational Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

Your AI company lives and breathes innovation. However, in the eyes of regulators and enterprise clients, your groundbreaking algorithms are only as valuable as the security framework protecting them. While your engineering teams focus on pushing boundaries, your stakeholders need absolute confidence that their data, your models, and your shared intellectual property are secure.

This is where ISO 27001 Clause 5.3 becomes essential. Far from being administrative red tape, it is the blueprint for building accountability directly into your security programme. It ensures that specific individuals are watching the castle. For an AI-driven business, compliance with Clause 5.3 is not just a box-ticking exercise, it is the unshakable foundation of trust required to scale and lead the market.

Key Takeaways for Fast-Moving AI Teams

• Mandatory Requirement: Clause 5.3 is non-negotiable in the ISO 27001 standard. You must clearly define and assign roles, responsibilities, and authorities for your Information Security Management System (ISMS).
• Critical Roles: The clause necessitates assigning key responsibilities to specific individuals, such as the CEO, an Information Security Manager, and a Management Review Team.
• Documentation is Evidence: Auditors will demand documented proof of these assignments to verify that your organisation has a clear structure for its ISMS.

---

Demystifying ISO 27001 Clause 5.3: The “What and Why”

A strong Information Security Management System (ISMS) is built on clarity. Before implementing technical controls, you must define who is responsible for what. Clause 5.3 enforces this foundational discipline, ensuring every security-related task has a clear owner from day one. Get this right, and you prevent ambiguity, eliminate security gaps, and forge a culture of accountability.

What is ISO 27001 Clause 5.3?

The ISO 27001 standard officially defines Clause 5.3 as follows:

“Top management shall ensure that the responsibilities and authorities for roles relevant to information security are assigned and communicated within the organisation. Top management shall assign the responsibility and authority for: a) ensuring that the information security management system conforms to the requirements of this document b) reporting on the performance of the information security management system to top management.”

In plain English, this means top leadership must appoint specific owners for the ISMS. These individuals are responsible for ensuring the system meets the standard’s requirements and have the authority to enforce it. Crucially, they must report on the ISMS’s performance directly back to leadership.

Why This Matters for AI Companies

Implementing Clause 5.3 delivers tangible benefits specifically for AI development environments:

• Protection of AI Assets: Defined ownership ensures consistent security protocols for proprietary algorithms, massive training datasets, and model weights.
• Risk Reduction: Clear accountability ensures that risks unique to the AI lifecycle, such as data poisoning or model inversion attacks are identified and managed.
• Streamlined Compliance: Documented roles are a core requirement for other regulations relevant to AI, such as the EU AI Act or GDPR.
• Reputation Management: In the event of a breach, demonstrating a well-governed security programme helps mitigate fines and reputational damage.

The Key Players: Assembling Your Information Security Team

A successful ISMS is a team sport. Your success depends on a group of individuals with clearly defined roles and the authority to act. Below is the blueprint for structuring your security team to satisfy Clause 5.3.

Top Management: The CEO

As the ultimate authority, the CEO is responsible for securing the company’s core intellectual property. Their duties include:

• Setting the strategic direction for information security.
• Promoting a culture of security that aligns with business objectives.
• Signing off on resources, objectives, and risk treatment plans.

The Information Security Manager

This role is the operational hub of your ISMS, responsible for daily effectiveness. In an AI context, this person often bridges the gap between DevOps/MLOps and compliance.

ISMS Management & Improvement

• Overseeing the day-to-day operation of the ISMS.
• Developing and continually improving ISMS documentation.
• Managing the periodic update and review of documentation.

Oversight & Reporting

• Conducting a risk-based audit programme of all ISMS areas annually.
• Reporting to the Management Review Team on audit results, incidents, and new AI-specific risks.
• Maintaining a register of all security-related incidents.

Enablement & Support

• Providing information security training and awareness to all staff.
• Managing security questionnaires from suppliers and enterprise clients.

The Management Review Team

This team serves as the primary governance body. It should include representatives from engineering, product, and operations, plus at least one senior leader.

• Signing off on policies and documents related to the ISMS.
• Overseeing the risk register and mitigation plans.
• Ensuring resources are available to implement security controls.
• Communicating information security matters to the wider organisation.

The Third Party Manager

For AI companies, this role is critical due to reliance on cloud GPUs, API providers, and data labellers. Responsibilities include:

• Ensuring effective third-party management in line with company policies.
• Owning and maintaining the third-party supplier register.
• Reporting progress on third-party risk management to the Management Review Team.

The Implementation Playbook: A Step-by-Step Guide

Putting Clause 5.3 into practice is straightforward when broken down into actionable steps. Follow this playbook to define, assign, and document the necessary roles.

1. Identify the Roles You Need: Collaborate with top management to determine specific roles. Start with the standard list in Section 2.0 and adapt it to your engineering structure.
2. Document Roles and Responsibilities: You must formally record these roles. Use a dedicated document detailing what each role does. This provides the tangible evidence auditors require.
3. Assign People to Roles: Appoint internal employees or external resources. In smaller AI startups, one person can hold multiple roles, provided you manage conflicts of interest and segregation of duties (per ISO 27001 Annex A 5.3).
4. Establish the Management Review Team: Formally create this team with designated deputies. Meet monthly during implementation and quarterly once the ISMS is mature.
5. Create a RASCI Matrix: Use a RASCI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed) matrix to document ownership for each ISO 27001 clause and control.
6. Manage and Document Competence: Ensure assigned individuals are competent. Use a competence matrix to record skills, experience, and certifications. This is primary evidence for auditors.

---

---

Acing the Audit: How to Demonstrate Compliance

As a lead auditor, I can confirm that assessing Clause 5.3 is a structured process. Auditors look for specific evidence to ensure your governance is real, not just theoretical.

What an Auditor Actually Looks For

• Documented Roles: They need to see a formal document defining the Information Security Manager and Management Review Team. No documentation equals a non-conformance.
• Up-to-Date Assignments: A common failure is listing former employees in key roles. You must have a process to update assignments when personnel changes occur.
• Competence: Auditors will verify that individuals have the necessary training and experience to perform their roles effectively, often by interviewing them.

Your Pre-Audit Checklist

Use this checklist to confirm readiness before your external audit:

• [ ] Review Definitions: Are all key information security roles clearly defined in your documentation?
• [ ] Verify Assignments: Do you have signed letters or meeting minutes confirming who holds which role?
• [ ] Check Clarity: Are responsibilities unambiguous with no confusing overlaps?
• [ ] Confirm Authority: Do the assigned people have the actual power to enforce rules?
• [ ] Verify Communication: Has the organisation been informed of these roles via training or email?
• [ ] Interview Prep: Are key personnel ready to explain their responsibilities to an auditor?
• [ ] Process Integration: Are these roles integrated into risk assessments and incident management?
• [ ] Org Chart Review: Does the reporting line allow for direct communication with top management?

ISO 27001 Clause 5.3 FAQ

Can one person hold more than one role?

Yes. In smaller organisations, one person often holds multiple roles. However, you must avoid conflicting duties, such as having the same person implement a control and then audit it.

Who is responsible for ISO 27001 Roles and Responsibilities?

Top management is ultimately responsible. While they delegate tasks, they must assign the authorities and remain accountable for the ISMS’s success.

What specific responsibilities must be assigned?

Clause 5.3 requires assigning responsibility for: 1) ensuring the ISMS conforms to ISO 27001, and 2) reporting on ISMS performance to top management.

What happens if we don’t define these roles?

Without clear roles, security tasks are missed, leading to control gaps and confusion during incidents. An auditor will mark this as a major non-conformance, jeopardising your certification.

Conclusion: Turning Compliance into a Competitive Advantage

For an innovative AI company, properly implementing ISO 27001 Clause 5.3 is a strategic imperative. By establishing clear ownership, you build a resilient culture that protects your most valuable assets: your proprietary models, training data, and intellectual property. This commitment prepares you to pass an audit and builds deep trust with your customers. In a competitive AI landscape, that trust is what enables sustainable growth.

About the author

Stuart Barker is a veteran practitioner with over 30 years of experience in systems security and risk management.

Holding an MSc in Software and Systems Security, Stuart combines academic rigor with extensive operational experience. His background includes over a decade leading Data Governance for General Electric (GE) across Europe, as well as founding and exiting a successful cyber security consultancy.

As a qualified ISO 27001 Lead Auditor and Lead Implementer, Stuart possesses distinct insight into the specific evidence standards required by certification bodies. He has successfully guided hundreds of organizations – from high-growth technology startups to enterprise financial institutions – through the audit lifecycle.

His toolkits represents the distillation of that field experience into a standardised framework. They move beyond theoretical compliance, providing a pragmatic, auditor-verified methodology designed to satisfy ISO/IEC 27001:2022 while minimising operational friction.