How to Implement ISO 27001 Annex A 8.33 Protecting Test Information

How to Implement ISO 27001 Annex A 8.33

ISO 27001 Annex A Test information Implementation Checklist

Use this implementation checklist to achieve compliance with ISO 27001 Annex A 8.33. This control demands that all data used for testing purposes is rigorously selected, protected, and controlled to prevent unauthorised access to operational environments.

1. Define a Strict ‘Test Data’ Policy

Control Requirement: A formal policy must exist outlining exactly what data is permitted in non-production environments.

Required Implementation Step: Draft and approve a policy that explicitly forbids the use of raw production PII (Personally Identifiable Information) in testing environments unless a documented exception is signed off by the Data Protection Officer. Distribute this policy to all development leads and require a read-receipt.

Minimum Requirement: A signed document stating “Production data must not be used in testing without sanitisation”.

2. Mandate Synthetic Data Generation

Control Requirement: Test data should be generated artificially whenever possible to eliminate risk.

Required Implementation Step: configure development pipelines to use libraries (such as Faker for Python or Mockaroo) to generate dummy datasets that mimic production schema structure but contain no real data. Default to this method for all unit and integration testing.

Minimum Requirement: Developers use script-generated dummy data for day-to-day testing tasks.

3. Implement Database Sanitisation Scripts

Control Requirement: If operational data is used, it must be masked or anonymised before entering the test environment.

Required Implementation Step: Write and schedule SQL scripts or ETL jobs that automatically scramble sensitive fields (e.g., replacing emails with user_id@test.local, hashing passwords, nullifying phone numbers) during the replication process from Prod to Test. Do not rely on manual redacting.

Minimum Requirement: An automated script runs during every database restore to test environments.

4. Enforce Logical Network Segregation

Control Requirement: Test environments must be logically or physically separated from operational systems.

Required Implementation Step: Host test environments in a completely separate VPC (Virtual Private Cloud), Azure Resource Group, or physical network segment (VLAN). Ensure firewall rules explicitly block direct connections between the Test network and the Production database.

Minimum Requirement: Test servers cannot ping or connect to Production database ports.

5. Restrict Access Rights to Test Environments

Control Requirement: Access to test information must be limited to those who actively need it for their role.

Required Implementation Step: Audit current permissions and revoke “Admin” or “Root” access for developers on test servers that hold data derived from production. Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) ensuring only the specific project team has read/write access to their specific test instance.

Minimum Requirement: Developers do not share a generic ‘admin’ login for test databases.

6. Secure Data Transfer Channels

Control Requirement: Data moving from production to test environments must be encrypted in transit.

Required Implementation Step: Configure all database replication or copy jobs to use TLS 1.2 or higher. Ban the practice of emailing CSV exports or transferring database dumps via unencrypted FTP or portable USB drives.

Minimum Requirement: All data transfers occur over encrypted SSH or TLS tunnels.

7. Enable and Monitor Audit Logs

Control Requirement: Activities involving test information must be logged to detect unauthorised access or copying.

Required Implementation Step: Configure the test database and operating system to log successful logins, failed attempts, and bulk data export commands. Ship these logs to a central server (SIEM) or a locked-down S3 bucket to prevent tampering by testing staff.

Minimum Requirement: Logs exist showing who logged into the test database and when.

8. Automate Test Data Destruction

Control Requirement: Test information must not be retained longer than necessary.

Required Implementation Step: Implement a “Time-to-Live” (TTL) policy or Cron job that automatically deletes or resets test databases at the end of a sprint or after a defined period (e.g., 14 days). Prevent the accumulation of “stale” production data in lower environments.

Minimum Requirement: Test data is wiped or refreshed at least once per release cycle.

9. Review Third-Party Testing Agreements

Control Requirement: External testers or outsourced development teams must adhere to the same protection standards.

Required Implementation Step: Review contracts with external vendors to ensure they contractually agree to sanitise data and delete it post-testing. Require them to provide a certificate of destruction or evidence of deletion upon project completion.

Minimum Requirement: Contracts with external devs include a specific ‘Test Data Protection’ clause.

10. Conduct Quarterly Access Reviews

Control Requirement: Regular verification that access to test information remains appropriate.

Required Implementation Step: Perform a manual review of all user accounts on the test environment every three months. Remove accounts for leavers, movers, or developers who have rotated off the project to prevent “access creep”.

Minimum Requirement: A quarterly record showing signed-off user lists for the test environment.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.33 SaaS / GRC Platform Implementation Failure Checklist

The gap between GRC Compliance Tools and Engineering Reality
Control Requirement The ‘Checkbox Compliance’ Trap The Reality Check
Data Sanitisation SaaS tool asks: “Do you mask data?” (Yes/No). User clicks Yes. Developers are manually running `mysqldump` of the full production DB to their laptops because the “sanitised” set is broken.
Access Control SaaS tool verifies a policy document exists named “Access_Control.pdf”. The test database `root` password is “password123” and is pinned in the team Slack channel.
Network Segregation SaaS tool checks if you have a “Test” environment listed in assets. The Test server is on the same flat network as Prod and has an open SSH port to the internet for “easy remote work”.
Logging SaaS tool confirms you have a logging provider purchased. Logging is disabled on the Test DB to “save disk space” and “improve performance” during load testing.
Data Destruction SaaS tool sends a reminder email to “clean up data”. 3-year-old database dumps containing ex-customer credit card details are sitting in a forgotten `/tmp` folder on a dev server.
Transfer Security SaaS tool checks for an SSL certificate on the website. Developers are emailing unencrypted Excel spreadsheets of user data to personal Gmail accounts to “work on the weekend”.
Third-Party Access SaaS tool stores the vendor contract PDF. The outsourced QA team in a different country has full, unmonitored admin access to a clone of your production database.
ISO 27001 Toolkit

About the author

Stuart Barker
🎓 MSc Security 🛡️ Lead Auditor 30+ Years Exp 🏢 Ex-GE Leader

Stuart Barker

ISO 27001 Ninja

Stuart Barker is a veteran practitioner with over 30 years of experience in systems security and risk management. Holding an MSc in Software and Systems Security, he combines academic rigor with extensive operational experience, including a decade leading Data Governance for General Electric (GE).

As a qualified ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, Stuart possesses distinct insight into the specific evidence standards required by certification bodies. His toolkits represent an auditor-verified methodology designed to minimise operational friction while guaranteeing compliance.

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top