ISO 27001 Annex A 5.32 is a security control that requires organizations to implement documented procedures for protecting intellectual property rights. The primary implementation requirement involves maintaining a rigorous registry of software and data licenses, providing the business benefit of safeguarding proprietary AI models against legal infringement.
For any innovative AI company, your intellectual property (IP) is your most valuable asset. It is the core of your competitive advantage, embodied in your proprietary algorithms, unique training datasets, and sophisticated models. While this IP drives your company’s value, it also creates a landscape of unique and complex compliance challenges, particularly under globally recognised frameworks like ISO 27001. This guide is designed to demystify ISO 27001 Annex A 5.32 Intellectual property rights, explaining its specific relevance to your AI workflows and providing a clear, actionable path to robust compliance.
Table of contents
- The “No-BS” Translation: Decoding the Requirement
- The Business Case: Why This Actually Matters for AI Companies
- DORA, NIS2 and AI Regulation: You Must Respect IP
- ISO 27001 Toolkit vs SaaS Platforms: The IP Trap
- Demystifying Control 5.32: What ISO 27001 Actually Requires for Intellectual Property
- The AI Amplification: Unique IP Risks in Your Workflows
- Your Blueprint for Compliance: Actionable Steps for Protecting AI Assets
- The Evidence Locker: What the Auditor Needs to See
- Common Pitfalls & Auditor Traps
- Handling Exceptions: The “Break Glass” Protocol
- The Process Layer: “The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)”
The “No-BS” Translation: Decoding the Requirement
Let’s strip away the legal jargon. Annex A 5.32 is about making sure you own what you sell, and you don’t steal what you use.
| The Auditor’s View (ISO 27001) | The AI Company View (Reality) |
|---|---|
| “The organisation shall implement appropriate procedures to protect intellectual property rights.” | Don’t pirate software. Stop using cracked versions of IntelliJ. Pay for your Photoshop license. Don’t violate Open Source licenses. If you use GPL code in your proprietary model, you might be forced to open-source your entire product. Check the license before you import. |
The Business Case: Why This Actually Matters for AI Companies
Why should a founder care about “IP Rights”? Because an IP lawsuit can shut you down faster than a hacker.
The Sales Angle
Enterprise clients will ask: “Do you indemnify us against IP infringement claims?” If your answer is “We don’t track our training data sources,” they won’t sign. If your answer is “We maintain a rigorous data provenance register and ensure all training data is licensed for commercial use,” you win the deal. A 5.32 is your defence.
The Risk Angle
The “GPL Infection”: A developer copies a snippet of code from a GPLv3 repository into your core inference engine. Now your engine is technically GPLv3. If a competitor finds out, they can demand you release your source code. Annex A 5.32 forces you to scan for this before it hits production.
DORA, NIS2 and AI Regulation: You Must Respect IP
Regulators are cracking down on AI copyright infringement.
- EU AI Act: General Purpose AI models (e.g., LLMs) must respect EU copyright law. You must publish a detailed summary of the content used for training. If you can’t list your sources (because you didn’t track them), you are non-compliant.
- NIS2 Directive: Requires supply chain security. This includes the legal security of the software you use. Using pirated software is a vulnerability (no patches) and a legal risk.
ISO 27001 Toolkit vs SaaS Platforms: The IP Trap
SaaS platforms scan for vulnerabilities, but they often miss legal vulnerabilities. Here is why the ISO 27001 Toolkit is superior.
| Feature | ISO 27001 Toolkit (Hightable.io) | Online SaaS Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Comprehensive. Covers software, data, images, and fonts. | Code Only. Platforms scan GitHub for licenses but ignore the fact that Marketing is using unlicensed Adobe Stock images. |
| Ownership | Your Register. You keep the Asset Register. It proves you own your IP. | Rented Data. The record of your software licenses is locked in their tool. If you cancel, you lose your proof of purchase history. |
| Simplicity | Clear Policy. “Do not install unapproved software.” A simple rule for staff. | Complex Scans. You get 1,000 alerts about “MIT License” (which is fine) burying the one “AGPL License” (which is dangerous). |
| Cost | One-off fee. Pay once. Be compliant. | Per-Repo Cost. Some tools charge per repository scanned. |
Demystifying Control 5.32: What ISO 27001 Actually Requires for Intellectual Property
To build a compliant programme, you must first understand the precise requirements. This control is not about abstract legal theory; it is about implementing practical, documented procedures.
The Control in Plain English
The primary purpose of control 5.32 is to ensure your organisation complies with all legal requirements related to IP. It means moving beyond good intentions to establish a systematic approach.
What Counts as Intellectual Property?
For an AI company, this includes:
- Software Licenses: (e.g., Office 365, PyCharm).
- Open Source Components: (e.g., TensorFlow, Pandas).
- Training Data: (e.g., ImageNet, Common Crawl).
- Your Proprietary IP: (e.g., Your model weights, source code).
The AI Amplification: Unique IP Risks in Your Workflows
Your everyday workflows amplify traditional IP risks.
Sensitive Training Datasets
Using improperly sourced or licenced data can lead to severe copyright infringement claims. If you scrape a website that explicitly forbids scraping in its robots.txt, you are creating a legal liability that could force you to delete your model.
Proprietary Algorithms and Models
Your core IP requires robust protection to prevent unauthorised use. Without strong access controls (A 5.15), your model weights could be stolen and used by a competitor.
The AI Supply Chain
Modern AI development relies on a supply chain of third-party IP. Failure to track and comply with the licenses of pre-trained models (e.g., Llama 2 Community License) can result in legal consequences.
Your Blueprint for Compliance: Actionable Steps for Protecting AI Assets
Achieving compliance is a series of concrete actions.
- Create an IP Policy: Write down the rules. “We only use software we pay for.” “We check licenses before using open source.”
- Build an Asset Register: List every piece of software and dataset you use. Attach the license key or terms of use to each entry.
- Conduct Periodic Reviews: Once a year, audit a sample of laptops. Is there cracked software? If so, remove it.
The Evidence Locker: What the Auditor Needs to See
When the audit comes, prepare these artifacts:
- Software Asset Register (Excel): List of all paid software + License Keys.
- Open Source Inventory (SBOM): A list of libraries used in production and their licenses.
- Data Provenance Record: A document showing where you got your training data and why you have the right to use it.
- Acceptable Use Policy (Signed): Evidence that employees agreed not to pirate software.
Common Pitfalls & Auditor Traps
Here are the top 3 ways AI companies fail this control:
- The “WinRAR” Fail: You have trial software installed that expired 3 years ago. It proves you don’t manage licenses.
- The “Unlicensed Font”: Marketing used a paid font for the logo but didn’t buy the commercial license. Auditors love to check this because it’s easy to find.
- The “Copyleft” Surprise: You claim your software is proprietary, but a code scan reveals AGPL components. You are now legally compromised.
Handling Exceptions: The “Break Glass” Protocol
What if you must use a tool but can’t buy a license immediately (e.g., procurement delay)?
The Emergency Use Workflow:
- Trigger: Critical need for software, purchase pending.
- Action: Use a legitimate trial version (downloaded from official source).
- Constraint: Log the expiry date in the register. Do not use a “crack.”
- Review: Ensure purchase is completed before trial expires.
The Process Layer: “The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)”
How to operationalise A 5.32 using your existing stack (GitHub, Excel).
- Step 1: Request (Manual). Developer requests new library via Ticket.
- Step 2: Check (Automated). Use a tool (or manual check) to verify the license is permissive (MIT, Apache 2.0).
- Step 3: Approval (Manual). Tech Lead approves usage.
- Step 4: Record (Manual). Add to “Approved Software List” in Excel/Notion.
By using the High Table ISO 27001 Toolkit, you can transform this challenge into an advantage, protecting your assets, confidently passing audits, and building enduring trust.
ISO 27001 Annex A 5.32 for AI Companies FAQ
What is ISO 27001 Annex A 5.32 for AI companies?
ISO 27001 Annex A 5.32 requires AI companies to implement procedures to protect intellectual property rights (IPR). This mandate ensures that 100% of training datasets, model architectures, and proprietary weights are legally protected and that the organisation does not infringe on third-party copyrights, preventing legal liabilities that could jeopardise certification.
How should AI firms manage training data copyright under Annex A 5.32?
AI firms must establish a rigorous verification process for all data ingestion pipelines. To comply with Annex A 5.32, companies must document the legal basis for using 100% of their training data—whether through direct licensing, fair use justifications, or open-source compliance—to mitigate the 35% increase in copyright litigation risks currently facing the AI sector.
Are AI model weights protected under Annex A 5.32?
Yes, AI model weights are considered core intellectual property and must be protected under Annex A 5.32. Compliance involves implementing technical controls such as encryption, strict access logging, and “digital watermarking” to prove ownership and prevent the unauthorised extraction or “model stealing” of proprietary neural network parameters.
What are the risks of unlicensed open-source code in AI training?
Using unlicensed or restrictive “copyleft” code (e.g., GPL) in training sets can lead to “legal poisoning,” where the resulting model may be legally compelled to be open-sourced. Annex A 5.31 and 5.32 require AI companies to audit 100% of code-based training data to ensure adherence to software licenses and prevent unintended intellectual property leakage.
What evidence is required for an Annex A 5.32 audit?
During an ISO 27001 audit, the lead auditor will require proof of “Intellectual Property Governance.” Essential evidence includes:
- IPR Register: A centralised list of all proprietary models, datasets, and patents.
- Licensing Agreements: Documented proof of the right to use third-party datasets or APIs.
- Software Asset Management (SAM) Logs: Audit trails showing that 100% of development tools and libraries are correctly licensed.
About the author
