Home / How to audit ISO 27001 / How to Audit ISO 27001 Annex A 8.30: Outsourced Development

How to Audit ISO 27001 Annex A 8.30: Outsourced Development

In this ultimate how to audit guide to ISO 27001 Annex A 8.30 Outsourced Development, you will learn directly from an ISO 27001 Lead Auditor:

  • 10 Key Audit Steps
  • Verification Criteria
  • Required Evidence
  • The Pass / Fail Test

I am Stuart Barker, the ISO 27001 Lead Auditor and author of the Ultimate ISO 27001 Toolkit.

Using over 30 years of industry experience across hundreds of audits, I’m giving you the exact templates, walkthroughs, and practical examples you need to achieve ISO 27001 certification.

ISO 27001 Annex A 8.30 Outsourced Development Audit Checklist

Auditing ISO 27001 Annex A 8.30 Outsourced Development is the technical verification of security integrity within third-party engineering workflows. The Primary Implementation Requirement is the enforcement of contractual security mandates and automated code scanning, providing the Business Benefit of protecting intellectual property while ensuring external deliverables meet internal security standards.

This technical verification tool is designed for lead auditors to establish the security integrity of software developed by third-party providers. Use this checklist to validate compliance with ISO 27001 Annex A 8.30.

1. Outsourced Development Security Policy Formalisation Verified

Verification Criteria: A formalised policy exists defining the mandatory security requirements, coding standards, and testing protocols for all outsourced development projects.

Required Evidence: Approved “Third-Party Development Policy” or “Outsourced Coding Standard” with explicit version control.

Pass/Fail Test: If the organisation cannot produce a formalised document specifying the security mandates for external developers, mark as Non-Compliant.

2. Contractual Security Obligations and Right-to-Audit Confirmed

Verification Criteria: Technical and organisational security requirements, including vulnerability remediation SLAs and the right to perform independent audits, are embedded in the developer’s contract.

Required Evidence: Signed Master Service Agreement (MSA) or Statement of Work (SOW) with highlighted security clauses and audit rights.

Pass/Fail Test: If a third-party developer has access to the codebase without a contractually binding security schedule, mark as Non-Compliant.

3. Intellectual Property and Source Code Ownership Validated

Verification Criteria: Legal and technical provisions ensure the organisation retains ownership and control over the source code, preventing unauthorised reuse or retention by the provider.

Required Evidence: Contractual “Ownership of Work Product” clauses and access logs from the organisation-owned version control system (VCS).

Pass/Fail Test: If the outsourced developer hosts the organisation’s production source code on an unmanaged, private repository without administrative oversight, mark as Non-Compliant.

High Table Fay and Stuart 3
Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top