ISO 27001 Annex A 6.1 Audit Checklist

The ultimate audit guide to ISO 27001 Annex A 6.1 Screening

1. Personnel Screening Policy Formalisation Verified

Verification Criteria: A documented policy exists defining the mandatory background verification requirements for all candidates prior to joining the organisation.

Required Evidence: Approved Recruitment or Information Security Policy containing a dedicated section on “Personnel Screening” and “Background Checks”.

Pass/Fail Test: If the organisation cannot produce a formal policy that specifies the minimum screening requirements for different role types, mark as Non-Compliant.

2. Screening Rigour Proportionality Confirmed

Verification Criteria: The level of screening (e.g. basic vs. enhanced) is explicitly mapped to the business requirements, information classification access, and perceived risks of the specific role.

Required Evidence: Role-based risk assessment matrix or a HR screening tier list (e.g. Tier 1 for standard users, Tier 2 for Privileged Admins).

Pass/Fail Test: If high-privileged administrators undergo the same basic screening as non-technical entry-level staff without additional financial or enhanced background checks, mark as Non-Compliant.

3. Government-Issued Identity Verification Records Present

Verification Criteria: Formal verification of the candidate’s identity is performed using primary government-issued documentation to prevent identity fraud.

Required Evidence: Copies of passports, driving licences, or national ID cards held securely within the HR file (redacted where required by local law).

Pass/Fail Test: If a personnel file is missing a verified copy of a government-issued photo ID or evidence that the ID was sighted and verified against the individual, mark as Non-Compliant.

4. Academic and Professional Qualification Validation Evidenced

Verification Criteria: The organisation verifies that the candidate possesses the academic degrees and professional certifications claimed during the recruitment process.

Required Evidence: Verification logs from third-party screening providers or direct email confirmations/transcripts from the issuing educational institutions.

Pass/Fail Test: If the organisation relies solely on “Self-Attestation” (the candidate’s CV) for professional certifications (e.g. CISA, CISSP) without secondary verification, mark as Non-Compliant.

5. Legal Right-to-Work Compliance Confirmed

Verification Criteria: A formal check is conducted to ensure the candidate has the legal right to work in the specific jurisdiction where the service is being performed.

Required Evidence: Completed Right-to-Work check forms, visa status verification logs, or Home Office (UK) share code verification receipts.

Pass/Fail Test: If the organisation cannot produce evidence that a non-citizen’s work visa was verified before they were granted access to organisational assets, mark as Non-Compliant.

6. Criminal Record Check Evidence Identified

Verification Criteria: Criminal record checks are performed where permitted by local law and where the risk associated with the role justifies such a check.

Required Evidence: DBS certificates (UK), Disclosure certificates, or third-party background reports confirming the absence of relevant unspent convictions.

Pass/Fail Test: If a role involves handling sensitive financial data or child-related information and no criminal record check was performed, mark as Non-Compliant.

7. Employment History and Reference Verification Validated

Verification Criteria: The organisation validates the candidate’s previous employment history (typically for the last 3-5 years) and obtains character or professional references.

Required Evidence: Written references from previous employers or timestamped logs of verbal reference checks maintained in the HR system.

Pass/Fail Test: If an employee has been hired with gaps in their employment history exceeding six months that haven’t been documented or explained, mark as Non-Compliant.

8. Ongoing Screening Process Execution Verified

Verification Criteria: Screening is not treated as a “one-time” event; high-risk roles are subject to periodic re-screening or trigger-based re-validation.

Required Evidence: Re-screening schedule or logs showing that staff in critical roles (e.g. Finance/IT) undergo re-checks every 3-5 years.

Pass/Fail Test: If an individual has been in a high-privileged role for 10+ years and has never undergone a follow-up background check or credit check, mark as Non-Compliant.

9. Contractor and Third-Party Screening Alignment Validated

Verification Criteria: Agreements with external recruitment agencies or contractors mandate that they perform screening to the organisation’s defined standards.

Required Evidence: Signed Master Service Agreements (MSAs) with “Right to Audit” screening logs or certificates of compliance from the vendor.

Pass/Fail Test: If the organisation uses third-party contractors who have access to the ISMS scope but the contract doesn’t explicitly mandate screening equivalent to internal staff, mark as Non-Compliant.

10. Screening Documentation Retention Compliance Verified

Verification Criteria: Personnel screening records are retained securely and only for as long as legally required or necessary for the security of the organisation.

Required Evidence: HR Data Retention Schedule and evidence of secure disposal of surplus screening data (e.g. shredding certificates for unsuccessful candidates).

Pass/Fail Test: If sensitive background check data for rejected candidates is kept indefinitely in unencrypted folders, mark as Non-Compliant.

About the author

Stuart Barker
🎓 MSc Security 🛡️ Lead Auditor 30+ Years Exp 🏢 Ex-GE Leader

Stuart Barker

ISO 27001 Ninja

Stuart Barker is a veteran practitioner with over 30 years of experience in systems security and risk management. Holding an MSc in Software and Systems Security, he combines academic rigor with extensive operational experience, including a decade leading Data Governance for General Electric (GE).

As a qualified ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, Stuart possesses distinct insight into the specific evidence standards required by certification bodies. His toolkits represent an auditor-verified methodology designed to minimise operational friction while guaranteeing compliance.

Shopping Basket
Scroll to Top