In the fast-paced world of artificial intelligence, building a resilient and trustworthy business is paramount. A key component of this foundation is found in ISO 27001 Annex A 5.27 Learning from information security incidents. This control is a critical part of a robust Information Security Management System (ISMS). At its core, the purpose of this control is straightforward: it ensures that you learn from past mistakes so you do not repeat them. For an AI company, where proprietary data is your most valuable asset and complex algorithms are the engine of your business, implementing this control is not merely a compliance exercise. It is a fundamental strategy for protecting your core business value, building customer trust, and turning every challenge into a source of strength.
Table of contents
Why Learning From Incidents is Different for AI Companies
While the principles of Annex A 5.27 are universal, the unique workflows and high-stakes nature of the AI industry introduce distinct challenges that demand a specialised approach. A security incident in an AI context can have far-reaching consequences that go beyond typical IT disruptions. Understanding these specific risks is the first step toward building a truly effective incident learning process.
Exposure of Sensitive Training Datasets
An information security incident can do more than just disrupt operations; it can compromise the very data that powers your models. If an incident leads to the exposure of proprietary or sensitive customer training datasets, the impact can be catastrophic. This could result in a direct loss of competitive advantage if a rival gains access to your curated data, significant regulatory fines for breaching data protection laws, and a severe erosion of user trust that may be impossible to recover. Learning from incidents that threaten your data assets is crucial to safeguarding the lifeblood of your business.
Disruption of Algorithmic Processes
For an AI company, your algorithms are not just intellectual property; they are your core operational asset. A security event has the potential to catastrophically degrade model performance or compromise inference integrity. An incident could poison your model with subtle biases, degrade its performance, or even cause a complete operational failure. An incident that compromises their integrity, either during training or live inference, is an existential threat. A structured learning process allows you to analyse how and why an incident affected your models, enabling you to build more resilient algorithmic pipelines.
Vulnerabilities in the AI Supply Chain
The modern AI stack is a complex ecosystem of third-party data sources, pre-trained models, and MLOps platforms. This reliance on an external supply chain introduces a significant layer of risk. An information security incident originating within one of your suppliers – be it a data provider or a cloud service – can have a direct and immediate impact on your own operations. Therefore, your incident learning process must extend beyond your own perimeter to include events within your supply chain, allowing you to strengthen supplier agreements and develop contingency plans.
Addressing these unique challenges requires a practical and systematic framework for learning and improvement.
What You Need To Do: A Practical Framework for Incident Learning
Moving from the theory of compliance to the practice of resilience requires a structured, repeatable process. An ad-hoc approach where lessons are lost in email threads or forgotten after a meeting is a recipe for recurring failures. Industry analysis shows that organisations without a systematic learning process face up to three times more repeat incidents and waste nearly a third of their audit preparation time rehashing past failures. This section provides a clear, actionable framework to embed the principles of Annex A 5.27 into your company’s daily operations, ensuring that every incident, no matter the scale, becomes a catalyst for improvement.
Establish a Formal Incident Review Process
Your first step is to create a documented procedure that defines how you learn from incidents. This procedure must clearly outline roles, responsibilities, and triggers for initiating a post-incident review. A mature process doesn’t just react to breaches; it proactively analyzes trends in incident type, volume, and cost. Furthermore, it must distinguish between security incidents (a breach), security events (a possible breach), and security weaknesses (a flaw that could lead to an incident). Capturing lessons from minor events and weaknesses, such as a misconfigured cloud service or a broken lock on a door, is essential for preventing major incidents down the line. A key update in the 2022 version of ISO 27001 is a critical shift in focus. While the 2013 standard emphasized learning from “high impact” incidents, the new control mandates that you learn from all information security incidents, regardless of their size or severity.
Conduct Thorough Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
The primary goal of any post-incident review is to move beyond addressing immediate symptoms and identify the underlying vulnerability that allowed the incident to occur. A simple but powerful method for this is the “5 Whys” technique. By repeatedly asking “Why?”, you can peel back the layers of an issue to arrive at its foundational cause. This focus on root cause, rather than blame, fosters a culture of inquiry and continuous improvement.
The following table illustrates how the “5 Whys” technique can be applied to a common security incident:
| Level | Question | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Statement | Ransomware infected the server. | |
| Why 1 | Why did it get in? | Because an admin clicked a phishing link. |
| Why 2 | Why did the link work? | Because the email filter didn’t catch it. |
| Why 3 | Why didn’t the filter catch it? | Because the filter definition was 3 days old. |
| Why 4 | Why was it old? | Because the auto-update server crashed on Friday. |
| Why 5 / Root Cause | Why did no one know it crashed? | Because there was no monitoring on the update server. |
Document and Track Your Lessons
Information gleaned from your RCA must be systematically recorded to prevent organisational amnesia. Establish a central incident and corrective action log to formally document your findings. This is not just an internal IT record; it is a strategic asset. Learning isn’t left in a Slack thread or IT folder; it’s published in a central, searchable bank – for audit, sales, and management. This allows your sales team to respond to due diligence queries instantly and enables management to demonstrate a culture of improvement to the board. Crucially, every lesson must be translated into a concrete, assigned action with a named owner and a clear deadline to ensure accountability.
Improve Your Controls and Update Your Risks
The output of your learning process must feed directly back into your ISMS. Use the insights gained to strengthen your security posture in tangible ways. This includes identifying security weaknesses like unpatched software, misconfigured hardware, or the reception desk being unmanned at lunchtime. Lessons from a phishing incident, for instance, should lead not just to “enhanced training,” but to specific actions like updating web-filtering rules (a technical control), refining the supplier onboarding policy (a procedural control), and updating the risk assessment to reflect the heightened threat of social engineering.
Measure What Matters: Turning Learning into Measurable Results
The hallmark of a mature security program is its ability to quantify improvement. Your learning process is only effective if it delivers measurable results. To prove resilience to investors, enterprise clients, and auditors, you must track specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) related to incident learning. Critical metrics to monitor include:
- Time taken to close each action
- Reduction in repeat incidents audit to audit
- Audit feedback, e.g. moving from ‘clarification needed’ to ‘no findings’
Tracking these KPIs provides concrete evidence that your organisation is not just logging incidents but is actively strengthening its defences over time.
A robust framework is essential, but it is most effective when supported by the right set of tools.
The Solution: Building a Resilient Learning Culture with the High Table Toolkit
A durable and effective incident learning process cannot be sustained on a foundation of scattered spreadsheets, disparate documents, and ad-hoc email chains. To truly embed this capability into your culture, you need a solid foundation of clear, consistent, and accessible documentation and procedures.
This is where the High Table ISO 27001 Templates Toolkit, available at https://hightable.io/product/iso-27001-templates-toolkit/, provides a decisive advantage. For a growing AI company, a toolkit of expertly crafted templates offers a more strategic solution than adopting a rigid online Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform.
Here’s why a template-based approach is superior for your needs:
- Full Ownership and Control: Templates provide you with complete ownership of your ISMS documentation and data. You are not locked into a specific vendor or dependent on a third-party platform’s uptime. This is non-negotiable for AI companies whose ISMS documentation details the ‘crown jewels’ – your most sensitive risks and architectural vulnerabilities.
- Deep Customisation: AI workflows and technology stacks are highly specialised and constantly evolving. Templates can be precisely tailored to your unique processes, data types, and operational realities, rather than forcing you to conform to the constraints of a one-size-fits-all software interface.
- Fosters Deeper Understanding: A consultant’s primary goal is to build internal capability, not dependency. Templates force your team to internalize the ‘why’ behind the controls, creating a resilient security culture that a check-the-box SaaS tool cannot replicate. This process builds genuine, in-house expertise.
The High Table toolkit directly addresses the challenges outlined earlier by providing the specific documentation you need to succeed. Key documents such as the Incident Management Procedure, Incident and Corrective Action Log, and Risk Assessment Templates give you the exact structure required to implement the practical framework described in the previous section. This enables you to move quickly from planning to execution, with the confidence that your approach is aligned with proven best practices.
By providing the right structure, the toolkit empowers you to build a genuine culture of continuous improvement.
Own Your ISMS, Don’t Rent It
Do it Yourself ISO 27001 with the Ultimate ISO 27001 Toolkit
Conclusion: Turning Compliance into a Competitive Edge
For an innovative AI company, mastering the discipline of learning from information security incidents is not a compliance burden; it is a strategic imperative. A robust implementation of ISO 27001 Annex A 5.27 transforms your response to adversity into a powerful engine for building resilience, earning customer trust, and creating a sustainable competitive advantage. It proves to partners, investors, and regulators that your organisation is built to last.
The High Table toolkit serves as the practical catalyst for this transformation. It empowers your business with the structure and guidance needed to turn every incident – large or small – into a valuable opportunity for growth, ensuring that your organisation not only survives challenges but emerges from them stronger, smarter, and more secure.
About the author
Stuart Barker is a veteran practitioner with over 30 years of experience in systems security and risk management.
Holding an MSc in Software and Systems Security, Stuart combines academic rigor with extensive operational experience. His background includes over a decade leading Data Governance for General Electric (GE) across Europe, as well as founding and exiting a successful cyber security consultancy.
As a qualified ISO 27001 Lead Auditor and Lead Implementer, Stuart possesses distinct insight into the specific evidence standards required by certification bodies. He has successfully guided hundreds of organizations – from high-growth technology startups to enterprise financial institutions – through the audit lifecycle.
His toolkits represents the distillation of that field experience into a standardised framework. They move beyond theoretical compliance, providing a pragmatic, auditor-verified methodology designed to satisfy ISO/IEC 27001:2022 while minimising operational friction.
