How to Audit ISO 27001 Annex A 5.1 Policies for Information Security

Auditing ISO 27001 Annex A 5.1 is a rigorous governance assessment that evaluates the maturity and operational effectiveness of an organization’s security policies. By auditing this control, firms satisfy the Primary Implementation Requirement of policy tailoring, delivering the Business Benefit of a legally defensible and risk-aligned security framework.

Auditing ISO 27001 Annex A 5.1 requires a deep dive into the governance layer of an organisation. An auditor must ensure that policies are tailored to the specific risk profile of the business rather than being generic templates. This process involves verifying management commitment, technical accuracy, and the effectiveness of communication across the workforce.

1. Formalise Policy Ownership and Accountability

Identify the designated owners for each security policy and verify that they possess the necessary authority and technical competence. Accountability ensures that policies are kept current and relevant to the evolving threat landscape.

• Verify that ownership is documented within the policy metadata or the Asset Register.
• Confirm that owners review policies at least annually or upon significant organisational change.
• Audit the link between policy ownership and internal IAM roles to ensure management oversight.

2. Validate Executive Approval and Commitment

Examine evidence that senior management has formally approved the information security policies. Without documented approval, policies lack the mandate required to enforce compliance across the organisation.

• Inspect meeting minutes from the ISMS Steering Committee or Board level.
• Ensure approval records include the specific version and date of the policy.
• Check that the “Top Management” signature is present on the primary Information Security Policy.

3. Audit Policy Communication and Accessibility

Determine how policies are distributed to employees and relevant third parties. A policy is only effective if it is accessible to those required to follow it, including contractors and external partners.

• Check the internal intranet or Document Management System for ease of access.
• Review onboarding records to ensure new starters acknowledge the policies.
• Verify that specific technical policies, such as Cryptography or Access Control, are shared with relevant technical teams.

4. Review Policy Maintenance and Update Cycles

Verify that the organisation has a defined schedule for reviewing policies. This step ensures that the ISMS reacts to new security threats, legislative changes, and technological advancements.

• Check the revision history for every core policy to confirm regular updates.
• Audit the process for “ad-hoc” reviews following a significant security incident.
• Cross-reference policy dates with the latest version of the ISO 27001 standard.

5. Evaluate Alignment with Risk Assessment

Ensure that the policies directly address the risks identified in the organisation’s Risk Treatment Plan. Policies should provide the high-level requirements that technical controls are built to satisfy.

• Compare the Access Control Policy against the current IAM role matrix.
• Verify that the Cryptography Policy reflects the sensitivity of data stored in the Asset Register.
• Check for a direct mapping between policy statements and identified business risks.

6. Audit Version Control and Integrity

Inspect the document control process to prevent the use of obsolete or unauthorised policy versions. Poor version control leads to conflicting instructions and security gaps.

• Confirm that only the latest approved version is available to the general workforce.
• Check that archived versions are stored securely to prevent accidental implementation.
• Verify that unique identifiers are used for every policy document.

7. Inspect Exception Handling and Non-Compliance

Examine the records of any policy exceptions. A robust audit must show that deviations from policy are documented, risk-assessed, and approved by the appropriate authority.

• Review the Exception Log for outdated or unreviewed policy bypasses.
• Check that exceptions have a defined expiry date and a plan for eventual remediation.
• Verify that non-compliance with policies triggers a formal disciplinary or corrective action process.

8. Assess Technical Control Mapping

Verify that the high-level policy requirements are actually implemented via technical configurations such as MFA or encryption. This bridges the gap between “paper compliance” and real security.

• Sample technical settings in the cloud environment to see if they match the Password Policy.
• Check that the Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) is reflected in web filtering categories.
• Review Right to Audit (ROE) clauses in supplier contracts to ensure policy alignment.

9. Monitor Training and Awareness Integration

Confirm that the contents of the security policies are integrated into the annual security awareness training. Employees should not just “read” policies but understand their practical application.

• Audit training modules for specific mentions of policy requirements.
• Check quiz results or acknowledgement logs for comprehension of the Acceptable Use Policy.
• Verify that specialised policies are reinforced through targeted technical training for IT staff.

10. Confirm Third-Party Policy Compliance

Audit how the organisation ensures that suppliers and contractors adhere to its security policies. Supply chain vulnerabilities often stem from third parties operating outside of the host organisation’s policy framework.

• Review Supplier Security Agreements for clauses mandating policy adherence.
• Verify that contractors are provided with a “Supplier-Specific” version of security policies.
• Check for evidence of third-party audits or self-attestations regarding policy compliance.

ISO 27001 Annex A 5.1 Audit Steps and Evidence

Table 1: Detailed Audit Steps, Execution Methods, and Evidence Examples

Audit Step	How To Execute	Common Examples of Evidence
1. Ownership Verification	Interview Policy Owners to confirm they understand their technical responsibilities.	Roles and Responsibilities Matrix, Asset Register entries.
2. Management Approval	Review Board or ISMS Committee minutes for policy sign-off dates.	Signed PDF policies, Meeting Minutes, Email approvals from the CEO.
3. Communication Audit	Sample employee records to find signed acknowledgements of the AUP.	HR Portal logs, Onboarding checklists, LMS completion certificates.
4. Review Cycle Check	Check the “Date of Last Review” against the “Review Frequency” defined in the ISMS.	Policy Revision History table, Calendar invites for review meetings.
5. Technical Alignment	Cross-reference the Password Policy with Active Directory or Okta settings.	Screenshots of MFA settings, Password complexity configurations.
6. Version Control	Attempt to access the policy folder as a guest to check for unauthorised edits.	SharePoint version history, restricted folder permissions.
7. Exception Logging	Inspect the register of active security exceptions for senior management signatures.	Risk Register, Signed Exception Request forms.
8. Training Integration	Review awareness training slides for policy-specific scenarios.	Training materials, Phishing simulation results based on policy.
9. Third-Party Alignment	Examine a random sample of supplier contracts for security annexes.	MSA (Master Service Agreements), Supplier Security Questionnaires.
10. Legal Mapping	Check if the Privacy Policy specifically references the Data Protection Act 2018.	Legal Register, Regulatory compliance cross-walk documents.

Common SaaS and GRC Platform Audit Failures

Table 2: Why automated SaaS and GRC platforms often fail Annex A 5.1 audits

Failure Mode	The SaaS / GRC Platform Bias	Audit Consequence
Template Stagnation	Users rely on “out-of-the-box” platform templates that don’t reflect actual business processes.	Non-conformity for policies not being “tailored” to the organisation.
Zombie Approvals	Automated workflows mark policies as “Approved” without actual executive review or dialogue.	Major finding for lack of genuine management commitment and oversight.
Ghost Owners	Platforms auto-assign ownership to the “IT Admin” who may not have authority or knowledge.	Observation on lack of defined accountability and technical competence.
Siloed Compliance	Policies live in the GRC platform but are never read or seen by the actual workforce.	Failure in “Communication” (Clause 7.4) and Annex A 5.1 awareness.
Lack of Technical Proof	Software says a policy is implemented, but there is no link to the actual technical configuration.	Inability to provide objective evidence of control effectiveness.
Review Fatigue	Users “bulk approve” reviews in the platform just to clear notifications before an audit.	Audit trail shows a lack of due diligence and critical thinking.
Implicit Risk Gaps	Generic platform risks don’t cover specific local threats (e.g., UK-specific legal issues).	Policies fail to address the actual risks in the Risk Treatment Plan.
Artificial Acknowledgement	Employees “click through” policy updates in the platform without reading the content.	Staff interviews reveal a total lack of policy understanding during the audit.
Version Disconnect	The GRC platform version of a policy differs from what is on the company intranet.	Serious failure in document control and versioning integrity.
Platform Over-Reliance	The organisation cannot explain the “Why” behind a policy statement, only the “How” of the software.	Auditor identifies a lack of internal security culture and ownership.

About the author